Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education has always been an inevitable part of today's life in all societies. There are also several approaches to enhance the quality of education. Some people believe that spending great amount of money on professors' salaries could improve the quality of education in universities, while others opine that other factors are much important. I firmly believe that educational institutes such as universities and colleges should spend a great deal of money on their professors' salaries in order to augment the quality of learning due to the following reasons:
First and foremost, much more money professors earn, much more motivation they have to teach and spend their time for improving the quality of methods and materials they apply to teach their students. A prime example from my own experience may illustrate this point clearly. In the university which I graduated from there were two types of professors, the ones who received great salaries and the others who received average wages. Their performances were distinctly different according to the amount of money they earn. The professors who had better salaries were more energetic and active as well as introducing novel and practical information in their classes and encouraged students to participate in related activities to learn better. Results of a survey conducted in my country reveals that the universities that spent great portion of their budget to their professor's wages have more successful students and foster prosperous specialists, thanks to the high quality methods that their professors exerted to teach them.
Second, part of these salaries is related to the money that the professors could spend on just academic activities such as doing research and equipping their laboratories. Therefore, professors who earn noticeable salaries could attract more interested students to participate in research projects and enrich their resume for their future jobs or improving their backgrounds for graduate degree. Consequently, the universities could boost the quality of their academic research projects.
To sum up, according to all aforementioned above, dedicating a large percentage of universities' budgets on professors' salaries brings about high quality education since it becomes incentive to improve teaching methods and pave the way for huge numbers of research projects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...learning due to the following reasons: First and foremost, much more money prof...
^^
Line 2, column 736, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ticipate in related activities to learn better. Results of a survey conducted in my co...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir professors exerted to teach them. Second, part of these salaries is relate...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y of their academic research projects. To sum up, according to all aforemention...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54444444444 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8885897281 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516666666667 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.761596892 48.9658058833 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 153.538461538 100.406767564 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6923076923 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222040665031 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082651174639 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512917312785 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146131076424 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271812030772 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 11.7677419355 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 10.9000537634 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.