Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Thorughout history, there have been many roles in all societies, yet the prominent one is leadership since it has widespread impacts on people's lives and because of this issue, leaders should have specific characteristics in order to be successful in their jobs. In this regard, some believes that leadership is a natural personality, while others look at this concept from a distinctive perspective and hold this opinion that leadership has to be learned and it is a definitely aquired characteristic. I, personally, subscribe to the latter group for quite a few reasons, two of which are as follows.
For one thing, since leadership like other pivotal social roles requires skills and techniques, there has to be taught to people who are managers or leaders. In other words, leaders should learn how to lead their members effectively in order to meet the requirements of the community and achieve their ends successfully. Additionally, combination of several approaches or novel methods would assist the leaders to boost the effectiveness of their role in their society. It is statistically proved that societies in which people achieve leadership based on hirercy, they leadership faces failure and the level of disagreement among citizens is higher in comparison to the communities people elect their leaders based on their qualifications they have earned in their lives. This clearly indicates the role of education and learning skills on becoming a successful leader.
Another equally momentous reason that I should mention is that ones who would like to be leaders should practice uninterrupted in order to intensify their characteristics as a leader.By this I mean, every skill or role can be improved by practice and leadership should not be neglected in this regard. No matter a person knows how to manage or lead others, he or she ought to know that as like athletes need exercise and practice to sustain their muscle mass, people should practice what they have learned recently, alongside, what they know naturally as leaders. To illustrate my point of view, there is a well-known proverb which states:" Practice makes perfect." This reveals the impacts of practice in the realm of being a leader.
To sum it up, according to all reasons that discussed above, I, strongly, disagree that leadership skill is a natural gift that cannot be acquired by teaching since not only do leaders learn novel skills and mixed techniques to improve the effectiveness of their leadership, but they should practice all the time to strengthen their skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...iques, there has to be taught to people who are managers or leaders. In other words, le...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
...nsify their characteristics as a leader.By this I mean, every skill or role can be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, then, well, while, as to, i mean, for one thing, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21549636804 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00165967064 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510895883777 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.1344086022 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.004351146 48.9658058833 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.5 100.406767564 179% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.4166666667 20.6045352989 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168976960131 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694004899125 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469552601822 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120855974466 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284384161717 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 11.7677419355 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 58.1214874552 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.1575268817 163% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.0537634409 155% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.247311828 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.