Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Even though there is a widely held notion that the key to improving the quality of student's education in the universities is upgrading the experimental equipment, I subscribe to the view that increasing the payment professors receive will have a much more positive effect on students. I will explore my reasons of support in the following.
First of all, the professor's performance in the lectures is the most vital part of the students' learning procedure, and we cannot guarantee the productivity of these lectures unless we make sure that professors have enough motivation to be enthusiastic in their classes. I believe that one essential way of providing this motivation is to support the professors financially. If the professors don't suffer from any monetary issues in their lives, they would be able to severely focus on the teaching material and gather enough information to be aware of the most recent discoveries in the science world. For example, at my university, young lecturers don't receive a reasonable payment. As a result, they have to struggle with many financial problems that interfere with their studying and affect their teaching performance negatively. I think that if our university had dedicated more funding to the young professors, the classes they present would have been significantly more beneficial for the students.
Additionally, professors usually take responsibility for various projects in the university and hire some students to proceed with the projects. If the universities provide them more salary, these projects will become vaster, and more students could be involved in them. The students take huge advantages from such projects since it will give them an opportunity to learn how to bring their theoretical ideas into practice. Also, many scientific papers are published base on the data gathered by these projects. Therefore, by increasing the professors' salary, the students would have more real-world application experiences and have a better chance to write approved scientific papers. For example, my thesis was based on a brilliant idea to decrease the amount of leakage in the pipes, which are designed to carry out oil and other liquids. After my professor was promoted and earned a raise in his salary, he supported me in testifying my idea in a well-known company. As a result, the paper we published base on this idea attracted so much attention since it worked perfectly in practice as well. If my professor hadn't had the money to afford the test of my idea in a big company, my paper wouldn't have been of high quality.
In conclusion, I believe that devoting more money to professors has great advantages because they would exclusively concentrate on teaching rather than being concerned all the time about money, and also can take care of more projects which students really rely on for becoming ready in their future career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reasons of support in the following. First of all, the professors performance...
^^^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
... the following. First of all, the professors performance in the lectures is the most...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ofessors financially. If the professors dont suffer from any monetary issues in thei...
^^^^
Line 5, column 651, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...mple, at my university, young lecturers dont receive a reasonable payment. As a resu...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly more beneficial for the students. Additionally, professors usually take re...
^^^^
Line 9, column 542, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
... projects. Therefore, by increasing the professors salary, the students would have more re...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1117, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...ly in practice as well. If my professor hadnt had the money to afford the test of my ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1194, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...t of my idea in a big company, my paper wouldnt have been of high quality. In con...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er wouldnt have been of high quality. In conclusion, I believe that devoting m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, really, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2431.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19444444444 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90505499891 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525641025641 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 777.6 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.5001802287 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.055555556 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130947822709 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466757820892 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443027437121 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926529702584 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214345981551 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.