o you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The question of whether students should focus deeply on the most related courses to their major or study various fields to obtain vast knowledge of different subjects requires essential attention. In my perspective, familiarity with different classes and areas could benefit students significantly for several reasons.
First of all, to make a proper decision for future careers, students should extend their knowledge horizon and take taste in different areas rather than restricting their studying to a few subjects. To be more specific, one can find the field study most suitable to his talents and interest exclusively by evaluating his performance in many fields. For instance, before attending college, I chose electrical engineering to study. I had superficial information about the area back then, but I didn’t bother myself for broader investigation and picked this field blindly. After passing a few courses, I realize that the courses related to programming were noticeably more attracting to me while I could barely tolerate the courses exclusive to my major. Had I taken a few different classes before choosing my major, I could have avoided the difficulties which I had to go through studying this field.
Second, there is a noticeable interaction between scientific subjects. Consequently, one can never understand a specific topic deeply and work practically in that subject unless he achieves enough information about the fields which are somehow related to that topic. For example, I am an electrical engineer, in one of my assignments, I was required to design an electric tool for displacing simple objects. To accomplish this, not only did I need the fundamental skills of my own major, but also a basic knowledge of mechanical engineering was also extremely vital.
However, it is undeniable that the most significant improvements in many fields are accomplished by experts who have far-reaching studying in a specific field. But this is the case when those professionals have chosen their career and have already gained efficient information in many subjects.
In conclusion, broad educations result in a better choice of future jobs and also brings about better chances to bring your ideas into practice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether students should focus deeply on the mos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts significantly for several reasons. First of all, to make a proper decision ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ad to go through studying this field. Second, there is a noticeable interactio...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...engineering was also extremely vital. However, it is undeniable that the most ...
^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ficient information in many subjects. In conclusion, broad educations result i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38309859155 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01576364969 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585915492958 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.45270909 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.4 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128760843561 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398330856987 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362498350399 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0779194001415 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261741907451 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.