Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Having a communication with a group, people enable to perform their tasks in an excellent fashion. In this matter, I agree with this statement that having communication in person instead of by e-mail will produce better work for the project. The reasons to support my viewpoint are elaborated upon in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, individuals are able to reach an agreement about practical solutions in the short time. To be more specific, when classmates or colleagues conduct a project within a group or individually, they need to find a solution for their upcoming problems and challenges. In this regard, if team members are close to each other in work place, they will talk and share their ideas and opinions through discussions. Watching problems from different view, they are able to choose an effective and practical method. On the other hand, through the media, such as e-mail they need to transfer various messages to reach agreement. Besides, a considerable number of people are not professional enough in using an e-mail or other means of communications. In this case, reaching a consensus about the efficacious way for solving challenges will waste a lot of time for each member.
Moreover, using e-mail or other means of communication need to some prerequisites which are very expensive and not accessible. Individuals require the Internet connection and high-teach devices in order to communicate with their teammates. Undeniably, in some places people have not access to such amenities. To put it in other words, If people have not Internet connection, they will not able to sent messages to their colleagues or classmates. Furthermore, providing situation to have a fast Internet connection require to allocate a tremendous amount of money. It is no secret to anyone that individuals enable sit in one specific place and talk about their projects without spending money. Thus, it can be easily concluded that face to face communication do not need to waste money.
In conclusion, contemplating all the mentioned reasons and points, I do believe that having communication in person about a project is more effective method to produce better work for the project rather than using the media. Not only will team members reach better decisions in short time, but also they will save their money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an excellent fashion" with adverb for "excellent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...p, people enable to perform their tasks in an excellent fashion. In this matter, I agree with this stat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed upon in the following paragraphs. To begin with, individuals are able to r...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 840, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e efficacious way for solving challenges will waste a lot of time for each member...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... waste a lot of time for each member. Moreover, using e-mail or other means of...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 528, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'allocating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: allocating
...have a fast Internet connection require to allocate a tremendous amount of money. It is no ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons and points, I do believe that having communication in person about a project ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, in conclusion, in short, such as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18037135279 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93595731436 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503978779841 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.85867647 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.789473684 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8421052632 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329475734337 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093069480336 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967914964758 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229504821511 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927879870097 0.0645574589148 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.