Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Talking face-to-face on all matters is valuable. However, the best option is to send an email. In today's, classmates or colleagues sending email to each other, which is most of the time is easier than seeing each other.

First, time has always been a big part of human lives. And humans try to achieve all of their daily activities in a specific time frame. With the advances in technology and the abundance of smartphones, students no longer go to group meetings as they used to, because they easily email each other, but in the past, people have had to go to meeting, even If they lived in different places, they would have had to attend meetings. But now, has made things much easier. Students also find more time to study. For example, when I was a biology student, we had many projects, and I always emailed what I found to my friends, we finished a 500 pages project in less than two hours, while others were discussed and at the end of the their meeting didn't finish their project, and also we always got better grades in exams because we had more time to study than them.

Second, email tends to be more reliable and secure, than meeting in person. In face-to-face meetings we have to discuss a topic or listen to repetitive topics and take notes all the time so that we don't forget something later. But when we send emails, we send all the useful and important stuff to the other person without any additional information. I remember, I had a classmate who was very talkative, he always talked too much in professional meetings that had not any related to the subject. Once one of the members suggested that we send the email to the group head instead of gathering together, and that was the best idea, because we no longer had to listen to the repetitive words of others.

In conclusion, talking at meetings is good, but time is a priority in the lives of all people. So, anything that takes less time is more affordable in today's lives.

Votes
Average: 2.8 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: SEND_AN_EMAIL[1]
Message: Consider using 'email'.
Suggestion: email
...aluable. However, the best option is to send an email. In todays, classmates or colleagues se...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 723, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...others were discussed and at the end of the their meeting didnt finish their project, and...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 741, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...sed and at the end of the their meeting didnt finish their project, and also we alway...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... and take notes all the time so that we dont forget something later. But when we sen...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to the repetitive words of others. In conclusion, talking at meetings is go...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57102272727 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44819616246 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539772727273 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.1276954361 48.9658058833 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5625 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0766646882317 0.236089414692 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0203608669767 0.076458572812 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248564472177 0.0737576698707 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0395971516258 0.150856017488 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325710264938 0.0645574589148 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.