When a project assigned to group of students then each individual learn much more effectively than project had done by an individual. My reasons behind it are as follows,
When students work together they all share their thoughts and ideas. Due to group each student get more ideas on a single project which gives choices to complete best. Each individual has different perception on a same thing. So when we work in group it helps to develop our own cognition. I had also experience same when I got group project during my internship on career talk then I realized that I have only one idea about career talk which is only based on information of subjects and courses.
Another reason is self understanding has four effective corner which are self awareness, self management, others awareness and others management. I am talking about it because we all are social animals and self understanding is most important aspect to get success. Two aspects of self understanding developed with ourselves only but for another tow we have to work within a group. because group provides situations to understand others and manage others. when we work in a group we learn more effectively about project as well as about ourselves.
at the end I want to conclude that when we do project individual then we are like a frog in the well. In a group we can learn more effectively about project as well as self.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
When a project assigned to group of students...
^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So when” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s different perception on a same thing. So when we work in group it helps to develop ou...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'experienced'.
Suggestion: experienced
...o develop our own cognition. I had also experience same when I got group project during my...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'corner' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'corners'.
Suggestion: corners
...s self understanding has four effective corner which are self awareness, self manageme...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...her tow we have to work within a group. because group provides situations to understand...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...to understand others and manage others. when we work in a group we learn more effect...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: At
... project as well as about ourselves. at the end I want to conclude that when we...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, talking about, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 1977.66487455 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 242.0 407.700716846 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79752066116 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72850272789 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 212.727598566 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537190082645 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 618.680645161 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8114849104 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3076923077 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6153846154 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207641068701 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845250264393 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724307713397 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149048718925 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621727159188 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 86.8835125448 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.