Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Eversince the down of civilization, community has been always among primary concerns of human beings. Without the shadow of doubt, each country’s society is made up of people of the same country, and so people can have a huge impact on community. A plethora of people possess the conviction that today, young people assign adequate time to helping their communities, whereas others hold exactly the opposite view. Whether one agrees or disagrees with it depends on the lens through which one is looking. I firmly am approval with the latter conviction. In what follows, I am going to aptly delve into the most outstanding reasons to advocate my viewpoint.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that in this modern era, youthful people elapse most of their time to find and have a suitable job, as well as striving to promote their work. In essence, people want to earn more money by spending more time on their work. Therefore, they cannot give enough time to helping their communities. As an example, in the advanced countries, people are more stressed to find a job than community matters, so they are less involved with societal issues. A recent study conducted by scientists of university of Virginia on the American people revealed that the most of them do not participate to helping in community affairs due to the many stresses related their works.
Another equally noteworthy point supporting this opinion is that unfortunately, today’s youth contemplate that spending time to help communities is a useless work and the most of them are unwilling to do it. Furthermore, they prefer to have amusement, rather than engaging with society matters. In my own experience, the majority of my friends did not like community discussions and problems associated with it, thus they would prefer to go to parties instead of taking part in these debating. According to a survey conducted in my country, back in 2013, 80 percent of people participated in society problems and arguments were those aged 40 to 60 years old not young people.
All aforementioned reasons point to my idea. However, an important issue that must be mentioned is that some counterexamples might exist. Nevertheless, that was a story in a nutshell. All and all, I highly recommend that all people, especially young people, should take part in community affairs in order to have a better and more progressive society, as well as lessening drawbacks in community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 184, Rule ID: ALL_AND_ALL[1]
Message: This phrase is nonstandard. Did you mean 'all in all' (=after all, nevertheless)?
Suggestion: All in all
...heless, that was a story in a nutshell. All and all, I highly recommend that all people, es...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04926108374 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87924186731 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6232399985 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.894736842 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3684210526 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232605334759 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663739723263 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647032724591 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126880944752 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699895873275 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.