Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is no secret that, the awareness of political and social issues can play a significant role in human beings life. These political and social matters may be debated in the classroom by teachers. Some people possess the conviction that teachers should not make their political and social attitudes known to students in the classroom, whereas others hold exactly an opposite view. Whether one agrees or disagrees with this depends on the lens through which one is looking. I firmly contend that teachers should not impose their views to mind’s students. In what follows, I am going to aptly delve into the most paramount reasons to advocate my view point.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that students are not mature enough to distinguish between different political and social views. Hence, when teachers impose their ideas to students, they cannot have unbiased interpretation about different events. As an example, it can be referred to the number of my friends who were imposed by their teachers in their childhood and they could not modify their attitudes even in their adulthood. Most of the scientists all over the world have conducted many studies which indicate that teacher’s statements directly influence on student’s minds. According to a recent statistic conducted by scientists of university of Virginia on the people’s minds revealed that 90 percent of them still follow their teacher’s attitude even after several years. In essence, they never make decision about political and social affairs by their own.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that imposing a teacher’s view to students makes all of them have the same idea. Also, it causes students unable to create new ideas about political and social issues, and therefore their country will not progress in these fields. For instance, In North Korea, the president imposes his views of political and social to the minds of the people which lead to a lack of improvement in political and social matters in this country. Studies and statistics underscore the fact that countries where teachers or persons owning authority do not force their political and social attitudes to the minds of students or people are more advanced in most of fields and also have further innovative people.
All the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that authorities should contemplate about efficient methodologies of teaching in schools. Nevertheless, that was a story in a nutshell. Obviously, there are many details, worth discussing, which are not mentioned here. All in all, i highly recommend that if authorities and teachers do not impose their views to minds of students and people, we will have creative people and as a result a progressive society in most of areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...es can play a significant role in human beings life. These political and social matter...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 690, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the fields') or simply say ''most fields''.
Suggestion: most of the fields; most fields
...students or people are more advanced in most of fields and also have further innovative people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 469, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the areas') or simply say ''most areas''.
Suggestion: most of the areas; most areas
...nd as a result a progressive society in most of areas.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, whereas, as to, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2349.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82237007487 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2194383962 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.45 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33396807807 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099861502812 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059795175108 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209681907367 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710990679893 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.