Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
This passage is about the agreement or disagreement with working in three days a week for long hours instead of five days working in a week for shorter hours. I actually agree with this idea and I hope to have this kind of job in future. In the following I will discuss more about my reasons.
My first reason is that you can divide the week's day into the two groups. Some days for work and the others for another activities for instance travel, going for a picknik, have some classes and everything else. So you can improve all aspects of your living and you can response to your personality needed completely. And I have some ideas about my handmade goods which take several times. Thus these four days is an enough time to make them as well.
The second reason in my opinion is about my personality. I am a hardworking person at all. So this kind of job is suitable for me, because I have ability to work for many hours continuesly. Working hard for many hours in three days and after that four days for other activities. It is my dream work. However mentioning this point is important that it really depends on everybody's personality. Some people can not work for many hours and they need more rest time between their activities. On the other hand there are people like me with hard working ability.
In conclusion, in my opinion these part time jobs (three days working for long hours) is really more sufficient than the usual jobs with five days working for short hours. You have three days for work and remained days for some other activities. In fact it sharply depends on the personalities of people. This kind of work is suitable for me because of my charactristics and behavior of acting in some majores.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...dea and I hope to have this kind of job in future. In the following I will discuss more a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'weeks'' or 'week's'?
Suggestion: weeks'; week's
...first reason is that you can divide the weeks day into the two groups. Some days for ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...andmade goods which take several times. Thus these four days is an enough time to ma...
^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... other activities. It is my dream work. However mentioning this point is important that...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...y. In conclusion, in my opinion these part time jobs three days working for long hours ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, really, second, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 310.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54838709677 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45171689083 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477419354839 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7878716427 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.5 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450161192949 0.236089414692 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138457616316 0.076458572812 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127257600933 0.0737576698707 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325828770071 0.150856017488 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741378677304 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 11.7677419355 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.81 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.77 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 86.8835125448 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.