Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In civilized and industrialized societies, teachers have played a pivotal role in human beings’ lives. Today, it is axiomatic that people elapse a part of their life educating. A plethora of people possess the conviction that it is better to improve the quality of university by raising the professors’ salaries, while others might hold exactly the opposite view. Whether one agrees or disagrees this depends on the lens through which one is looking. I firmly endorse the former conviction instead of the later one. In what follows, I am going to aptly delve into the most outstanding reasons to advocate my view point.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that increasing the salaries of professors will encourage their motivation to try hard for teaching. In essence, it can enhance their performance at university. It is undeniable that people suppose that if a professor receives more money from university, he will have a greater motivation and higher teaching quality. By and large, it is established beyond doubt that a high-wage professor can have a happier and more satisfying life than a low-wage professor. Therefore, this finding can at least partly explain why high salary is intrinsic for enhancing their performance in university. In my own experience as the teacher, when my wage was increased by school, my teaching quality also raised and my students were more satisfied with me.
Another equally noteworthy point supporting this opinion is that from a sociological point of view, a high-wage professor has less stress to have a comfortable life. It should be stressed that nowadays money has been always among primary concerns of human beings’ lives. In other words, employees’ salaries do not keep pace with the runaway inflation. Therefore, increasing professors’ wages lead to a reduction of anxiety resulting from life expenses and professors can educate in the classroom with more focus. We all know that they would not have relaxed financially had they not received enough salary. A recent empirical study on university performance in my country revealed that one of the factors contributing to a university’s high performance is determination of appropriate and sufficient wages for professors.
To put it in briefly, all the enumerated reasons lead us to the conclusion that raising the professors’ salaries gives rise to an improvement in the education quality at university. However, some counterexamples might exist, which are not mentioned above. As a result, I suggest conducting more surveys and studies to answer this question more precisely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 737, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...that one of the factors contributing to a university's high performance is d...
^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o answer this question more precisely.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, while, at least, in brief, as a result, by and large, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2215.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36319612591 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19296380374 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569007263923 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 708.3 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6300489563 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.476190476 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173110414245 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452175630774 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401293398229 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106742827366 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270116925319 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.