Do you agree or disagree with this statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In civilized and modernized societies, human beings have always strived to improve their living standards and bring more convenience to their day-to-day lives. Today, it is axiomatic that there are some rules, which youth should obey them. A plethora of people possess the conviction that it is possible following these rules by youth is too strict, whereas others might hold exactly the opposite view. I firmly endorse the first conviction instead of the latter. In what follows, I am going to aptly delve into the most outstanding reasons to advocate my point of view.
The first point to be mentioned is that, nowadays, a lot of rules have been established by authorities in societies. These rules are different in any community. In fact, it is feasible that some of these rules are strict to follow by people. For example, there are the rules related to the veil in some Asia countries. It is no secret that these rules are unpleasant for most of the young woman belonging to these countries. Therefore, they do not like pursuing these rules related the veil. Meanwhile, in this situation, some of them may immigrate to another country. In my own experience, I am citizen of Iran and I intend to immigrate to one of the Europe countries due to the veil regulations established in my country. Consequently, I would not have immigrated to another country had my authorities of my country not appointed these strict regulations.
Another equally noteworthy point supporting this opinion is that, although existence of the rules in any society is very useful for people, some of these regulations may be very strict to follow by youth. In fact, the enforcing these rules in communities annoys young people. For instance, In Canada, there are the strict regulations associated to driving, which are very annoying for youth. Even, form psychological point, some young people may do works against these strict rules and commit crimes. The noteworthy statistics, revealed by social research conducted in my country, show that any country that has very strict laws will have a high crime rate in that country. Thus, the more time elapses, the more authorities realize that enforcing very strict laws is not useful for community.
To put it in briefly, all the enumerated reasons lead us to the conclusion that youth are not satisfied to obey the strict laws, and enforcing these regulation cannot only increase the crime rate, but can also have negative impact on different fields of communities. However, a paramount issue that must be mentioned is that some counterexamples might exist, which are not mentioned above. As a result, conducting more surveys and studies to answer this question more precisely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 794, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trict laws is not useful for community. To put it in briefly, all the enumerated...
^^^^
Line 7, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to answer this question more precisely.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in brief, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2265.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05580357143 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75106422908 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482142857143 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 718.2 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7035939786 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4782608696 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4782608696 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65217391304 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18384019875 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561973977005 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463905431578 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109871105594 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321609812995 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.