Do you agree or disagree? It is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are younger rather than when you are older.
From a general point of view, in today's modern era we observe, in which having fun and entertainment are of great importance in people lives, It comes as no surprise that going to interesting travels around the world can play a vital role to that end. However, which stage of life is the best time for making abroad trips has been a rather controversial issue among many individuals. There are many who believe that travelling around the world in young ages is more appropriate than old ages. I to contrary, repudiate this idea. In what follows I shall elaborate more on this notion by focusing on two major reasons.
The first imperative reason is that in young ages people commonly do not have a considerable amount of money. It is needless to say that most of the job opportunities and professional activities are provided for people in young ages, and they should make money during their springtime of life. Rarely own young people an abundance amount of money, but traveling to abroad countries and visiting their spectacular locations need undoubtedly spending a huge quantity of money. Take an ordinary student from Iran as an example, and let's imagine that he wants to travel to European countries such as France, England, Italy, etc. In no way can he afford the visiting fee of interesting places in these countries like Eiffel tower in Paris or Big Ben in London and the luxury restaurants’ bills. Therefore, it is more rational that people make these trips when they have enough money and it normally happens at older ages.
Another notable reason which deserves some words here is that people during old ages have achieved more experiences that can use them during their journeys. For instance, people can learn several languages in high school or language institutes during young ages. If they go to abroad in old ages, by means of these young-age learned languages they can easily visit foreign countries that are familiar with their languages and significantly enjoy over there.
To sum everything up, we can logically reach this conclusion that it's better to make abroad travels when we are older since we possess more amount of money and also can benefit from more experiences collected from our young ages. Thus, it is highly recommended that people in young ages work hard and avoid from wasting their money to enjoy it later by going to old age journeys.
- Do you agree or disagree It is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are younger rather than when you are older 41
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Compared with people who live in urban areas those who live in rural areas can take better care of their families 80
- Do you agree or disagree It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends 78
- TPO-26 - Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: LETS_LET
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
...ry student from Iran as an example, and lets imagine that he wants to travel to Euro...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8987654321 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60771135527 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553086419753 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.6022441893 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3125 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105396095059 0.236089414692 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356365197861 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335751659118 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658929997684 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258503612361 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.