Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Compared with people who live in urban areas those who live in rural areas can take better care of their families

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Compared with people who live in urban areas, those who live in rural areas can take better care of their families.

From a general point of view, in today’s sophisticated era we observe, in which the mental and physical health of people has a great impact on society, it comes as no surprise that paying enough attention to our family members in particular, and their health can be quite vital. However, which living condition causes better efficacy in this case has been a rather controversial issue among many individuals. There are many who believe that living in rural areas provides a better situation for taking care of family members. I, to contrary, repudiate this idea. In what follows, I shall elaborate more on this notion by focusing on 2 reasons.

The first imperative reason is that urban areas in comparison to rural areas contain a high level of facilities and public resources by which people can take better care of their family members. Governments always allocate a huge budget to equipping cities with the best amenities such as shopping centers, hospitals, schools, cinemas, amusement parks, etc. On the other hand, scarcely do rustic areas encompass such complete facilities. Take an urban family as an example, and let’s imagine that the father of the family wants to make his children happy with an exciting entertainment on the upcoming weekend. He has a plethora of choices to do so. For instance, going to an amusement park, watching a football match at a stadium, enjoying live music at a concert hall, and a lot of other viable and exciting stuff. While in countryside areas probably none of these activities could be experienced by a rural family.

Another remarkable reason which deserves some words here is that in urban areas parents are highly educated and knowledgeable that helps them to manage a better tutelage of children. They completely perceive the importance of family and due to a notable educational background, they are familiar with appropriate manners of taking care of their family members. For further illustration, a recent yet well-regarded study, conducted at University of Gothenburg, can be pointed out. The researchers found out that 80% of European college-couples living in big towns, before pregnancy and childbearing process, have a complete plan for their children’s future from birth to adulthood. This provides additional corroboration for the idea that if parents possess high educational career, as they have in urban areas, they will provide a lot of better caring plans for their children.

To sum everything up, by considering all the aforementioned reasons, we can logically reach this conclusion that people who live in urban areas can take better care of their families than those who live in rural areas since cities have better facilities and public resources and parents living in cities are highly educated and knowledgeable. Thus, it can be safely predicted that children raised up in urban areas will be more appreciated to their parents in future because of having providing a convenient life for them in their childhood.

Votes
Average: 8 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 823, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lot of other viable and exciting stuff. While in countryside areas probably none of t...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, thus, well, while, for instance, in particular, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2523.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 486.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19135802469 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90858669171 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 806.4 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.8878755595 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.789473684 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5789473684 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332567848679 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921829149694 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950013311402 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212904596221 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720087763635 0.0645574589148 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.