Do you agree or disagree It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree? It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends.

From a general point of view, in today's sophisticated era we observe, in which people's lives is engaged with a plethora of relationships, it comes as no surprise that friends can play a vital role to make our life more convenience. However, how much we should be close to our friends has been a rather controversial issue among many individuals. There are many who believe that it is not possible that we tell the truth to our friends in all the conditions. I concur with this idea. In what follows, I shall elaborate more on this thesis by focusing on two reasons.

The first imperative reasons is that some issues are too private for everyone that prefers to no one be aware about it. It is needless to say that our friends, after our family members, are the closest people in our lives. But, there are some problems in our life that should remain as hidden as possible. Take a couple as an example, and let's imagine that they have a bad arguement with eachother and all the night are insulting with a numerous dirty words together. Tomorrow day will go to the work and associate with their close colleagues, it would be a sheer shame if they completely express what happened last night and what words they did use for insulting each other. Therefore, I think it's better that they avoid being honest and restate such a disgraceful story.

Another notable reason which deserves some words here is that sometimes we are encountered with a hard situation but we consider that as a good challenge that should be solved by ourselves, thus, no one should be aware from that. Despite of the fact that most of problems are unpleasant and disturbing, we sometimes embrace them to prove our abilities. But if our friends got aware of it, in no way would they leave us alone with that problem. For further illustration, a recent yet well-regarded study conducted at University of Gothenburg can be pointed out. The researchers found out that 85% of people who overcome their problems don't say the truth of their story to their friends and family members.
To sum everything up, we can logically reach this conclusion that being honest with friends is not always the best choice since some matters are too secret and some of them can be good challenges for us. Thus, it is highly recommended that we avoid from being honest with friends in some certain aspects of our lives.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (10 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...sible. Take a couple as an example, and lets imagine that they have a bad arguement ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the problems') or simply say ''most problems''.
Suggestion: most of the problems; most problems
...are from that. Despite of the fact that most of problems are unpleasant and disturbing, we somet...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 635, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...% of people who overcome their problems dont say the truth of their story to their f...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, i think

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67942583732 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57565190554 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535885167464 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3103791549 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61111111111 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150287670338 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492848781279 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428276510294 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10256434472 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047931638248 0.0645574589148 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.