TPO-26 - Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage.
In the reading, the author claims that the zebra mussle which is originally an Eastern European freshwater shellfish has recently occupied some parts of North America habitats and this can be a countinues threat to North American freshwater fish populations by pointing out tree reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas questionable and implausible, the lecturer totally repudiates the ideas and presents some evidence to contrary.
At first, the author asserts that the invasion of zebra mussel's has a historical clue which seems it can not become ceased easily and the North American habitats entirely will get occupied soon. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that the historical clue is not reliable since nowadayes the ships which have been mentioned in reading passage benefit from new ways which prevent them from carrying zebra mussles.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that if zebra mussels carried to a new settlement they would proliferate with a high rate and dominate the region since they have no serious predature. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this point by clarifying this fact that there are some birds that like to eat zebra mussles and prey them in the new area.
Finally, the author asserts the declination of fish population as the last point for supporting the zebra mussles invasion side effect. The lecturer, though dismisses it by pointing out that the negative impact goes only for fish which are dependent on plankton, while it can bring positive effects for buttom fish which are not plankton dependent.
- Do you agree or disagree It is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are younger rather than when you are older48
- My favorite soccer club20
- Do you agree or disagree It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends74
- TPO-26 - Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage.76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Compared with people who live in urban areas those who live in rural areas can take better care of their families80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...g out that the negative impact goes only for fish which are dependent on plankton...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17898832685 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53803896963 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579766536965 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.0826789713 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.375 110.228320801 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.125 21.698381199 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344690770447 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138804074122 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763476728657 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19332518318 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447534892554 0.0443174109184 101% => OK
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.3589403974 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 10.7273730684 191% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.2008830022 187% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.