Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage.
The reading proposes three theories about how agnostids may have lived. However, the lecturer finds all the theories dubious and presents some reasons to refute all of them.
The author asserts that the agnostids may have been free-swimming predators that hunted smaller animals. conversely, the speaker dismissed this idea by mentioning this point that predators should have well-developed eyes and having a good vision plays an important role for a predator, while it is reported that the agnostids had tiny eyes and even some of them were blind.
Furthermore, the reading contends that the agnostids may have dwelled on the seafloor. In contrast, the professor explains that they move pretty fast which is a highly unusual feature among the species lived on the seafloor. In fact, they lived in local areas where they were originated.
Finally, the reading passage claims that there is a possibility that the agnostids were parasites. But, it is reported that there was a large number of this species and therefore this theory is also dismissed since parasites usually die after they feed on the larger organisms and usually the number of them cannot be large.
From what has been discussed, all theories have weaknesses that cannot be accepted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Conversely
... predators that hunted smaller animals. conversely, the speaker dismissed this idea by men...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 135, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...tes. But, it is reported that there was a large number of this species and therefore this theory ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, may, so, therefore, well, while, even so, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 203.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26600985222 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5896809882 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1816692023 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.9 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 7.06452816374 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159399258439 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654478846316 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370705593089 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908173873249 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429236386654 0.0443174109184 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.