do you agree or disagree? it is difficult for teachers to be both popular and effective in helping students in learning
Today, one of the serious concerns of the teachers is communicating with students beside teaching perfectly. Some teachers believe that they should either be a good teaching person or a good friend and twice of them cannot be combined. Although they think combining the mentioned attitudes is impossible, I strongly believe that by the help of the new technology and psychological skills not only we can help them to study perfectly, but we also can be a good friend for them. I will elaborate on my ideas in the following paragraphs.
Initially, by the growth of technology, we are facing a great expansion of the facilities which helps people to fascinate their jobs. Although parents try to avoid their children from new technological products such as game consul or social media, teachers try to attract students to lesson and increase their concentration by the use of them in the class and homes. Also, by the growth of the technology, new experimental instruments enter teaching schedules to help students to experiment on the problems and facts individually, such as chemistry problems. A recent study shows that the schools which use new technological methods in their teaching method have more effects on their students result. In this regard, I think new technology would help students to learn better and attracted to lessons, so they would be friends with their teachers.
Second, psychological by setting up a new exhibition for different kinds of people, try to learn them how to use psychological methods to increase their efficiency in work. Teachers by learning new methods of the psychology not only learn to fascinate lessons to students by some acts like body language and voice intonation, but they also learn to find students psychological disease which caused from their childhood or parents treatment. For example, my teacher had a student who cannot focus on lessons and usually failed in the exams, teacher by speaking respectively with student found his problem and send him to a great psychologist in the town, sometimes later the students cured perfectly and passed lessons completely. The psychologist asserted to my teacher that if the problem had not found by the teacher, the student would have not passed exams successfully. In my opinion, teachers by learning these abilities can solve the student’s problem and lead them to a prosperous result in their exam.
To sum up, by the use of psychological skills and technological instrument teachers can significantly have a considerable influence on students, and be a good friend with them, also by the growth of the mentioned skills and instruments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 771, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...technology would help students to learn better and attracted to lessons, so they would...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, for example, i think, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2219.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16046511628 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99475022908 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462790697674 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.0691331442 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.933333333 100.406767564 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221729570385 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842768533058 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399729775858 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132620743835 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523972254969 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 11.7677419355 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.