Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration.
Give specific reasons and examples to support your idea.
In today's developed and sophisticated world, humans put considerable investment in exploring unknown phenomena that surrounded the world. Although some people are of the opinion that the government should not allocate money to space search and travel, I strongly believe that we should put efforts to search and explore the space for two reasons on which I will elaborate them in the subsequent paragraphs.
By the dawn of civilization, human has a severe problem for providing life resources, and this demand leads humans to use new explore technology on the earth. To be more specific, humans had to use new methods of sailing and navigating to find resources on the other lands, or use new tools and equipment to extract their need from the deeper layers of ground and sea. Today by the galloping rate of human reproduction, the earth is facing some crucial issues. Humans not only consume the limited resources to control their demands, but they also pollute the basic human needs, such as water and air. In this regard, the government should invest in substituting a new habitat for human beings, and the only place that has not been searched until now is space. So it is recommended.
The earth is surrounded by many critical threats that can strike to its safety, so humans should elaborate and predict them. To clarify this notion, many huge asteroids, sometimes bigger than the earth, are moving near the earth, so if one of them deviated to our planet and the Ozone layer cannot collapse it, it would destroy our lives on the earth. Also, we can see many atomic explosions on stars, similar to our sun, which can burn all of the livings in the earth and cause a great extinction. It is obvious that the more threat sensed by the governments, the more investment would be allocated to safety. A recent study shows that a huge asteroid hinted to the earth some million years ago, and causes dinosaur's extinction. The study shows that if the asteroid's attack had not happened many years ago, dinosaurs have not been extinct. Thus, humans for predicting these perils and having a substitutional life place, have to have a considerable fund in space exploration.
To sum up, investing in space exploration not only provides massive resources and new habitat, but it also can guarantee our life in facing space threats like asteroids. Thus, I suggest to the governments to invest in space search.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ars, similar to our sun, which can burn all of the livings in the earth and cause a great ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8826405868 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63989169516 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523227383863 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0783471753 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.470588235 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0588235294 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.52941176471 5.45110844103 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125654453673 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436665461102 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630825297071 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104937272892 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654547228682 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.