Do you agree or disagree? One can learn a lot about another people from the books and movies that he likes.
There is no doubt that people tend to take a break from their hectic life and unwind by devoting some time to their personal activities. Actually, there are unlimited ways to entertain themselves such as watching favorite movies or reading books with different subjects. Although some people adhere to this belief that people’s interests, tastes and character can be distinguished through what they read or watch, in my vantage point they may read books or watch movies which are distinctive with their opinion since they can enrich their knowledge, and fortify their analytical skills.
The first aspect to point out is that what provokes people to read books or watch movies which are against their opinion is expanding their knowledge. In fact, one of the rigors of modern hectic life is that people need to have wide variety knowledge to have promising future. Consequently, they try to broad their horizon and experience new things through reading books and watching movies in varied fields albeit they oppose with their favorites. Not only can they make rational decisions in catastrophic situations, they feel satisfied with themselves because of their proper information. In my own experience, last year I ran into a huge problem and felt despondent; so I started read a book in psychology field, although I did not willing to read it. Fortunately, understanding the concepts of this book leaves drastic effects on my personality and instills precious ideas so that revolutionizes my life. I have learnt I can benefit from reading books or watching movies even if I do not interest in them; hence, people’s favorite movies do not reflect their personality.
A further more subtle point is that people may read books or watching movies with different genre to strengthen their analytical skills. Undoubtedly, people need to strong analytical mind in order to make rational and immediate decision in catastrophic circumstances. In this way, they try to get familiar with critical situations through reading books or watching movies even they do not like them. To illustrate more, take a case of a person who hates science fiction movies; however, he watch this kind of movie every month to stimulate his creativity; also, he try to think about causes and effects of what he notices in these movies. It provides an opportunity with him to analyze situations and guess what will happen in the next part of the movie. Moreover, although he may first feel perplexed with strange actions of movies’ characters, he soon perceives its tangible benefits through improving his analytical thinking when he has trouble; therefore we cannot exactly understand people’s personalities from what they read or watch.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'watches'.
Suggestion: watches
...tes science fiction movies; however, he watch this kind of movie every month to stimu...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 565, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tries'.
Suggestion: tries
...h to stimulate his creativity; also, he try to think about causes and effects of wh...
^^^
Line 3, column 1051, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onalities from what they read or watch.
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'consequently', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'therefore', 'in fact', 'kind of', 'no doubt', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.232323232323 0.229887763892 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.159595959596 0.158761421928 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0868686868687 0.0866891130778 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0464646464646 0.046263068375 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0989898989899 0.0685040099705 145% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.115151515152 0.118717715034 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0262626262626 0.0351676179071 75% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85266205239 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0363636363636 0.0309702414327 117% => OK
Particles: 0.0020202020202 0.00188951952338 107% => OK
Determiners: 0.0424242424242 0.0887237588012 48% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0181818181818 0.0209618222197 87% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0181818181818 0.0139019557991 131% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2733.0 2387.08602151 114% => OK
No of words: 440.0 408.028673835 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.21136363636 5.86048508987 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.384090909091 0.338922669872 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.286363636364 0.251872472559 114% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.202272727273 0.174417080927 116% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138636363636 0.112833075102 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85266205239 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536363636364 0.524397521467 102% => OK
Word variations: 62.4678416739 59.2087087015 106% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6684587814 77% => OK
Sentence length: 27.5 20.5533526081 134% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1679939835 48.84282405 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.8125 120.699889404 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.5533526081 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0625 0.644075263715 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.5376344086 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 56.1363636364 45.7405998639 123% => OK
Elegance: 1.22516556291 1.45489161554 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243317182894 0.300154397459 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.117968767656 0.103427244359 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0886295185151 0.0752933317313 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.460274019742 0.497263757937 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.108240596347 0.151897553556 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100481547448 0.114077575197 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049045364613 0.0781384742642 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.474696639803 0.336927656856 141% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0125309212015 0.067059652881 19% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195368829963 0.210909579961 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00625070965751 0.0618886996521 10% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.91756272401 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.4623655914 244% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.75985663082 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.