Do you agree or disagree?
One can learn a lot about a person from the books and movies that he likes.
I firmly agree with the statement that we can learn a lot about another person from the books and movies the person likes.
Firstly, as the saying goes, we are what we read. books, as the unparalleled form of human civilization, bear the wisdom of people in history. if we pour our heart into reading of classics, not only can we experience humankind’s marvelous tangible achievements, we can also appreciate all the sparkling pearls of human thinking, i.e., philosophy, literature, history, etc. that will in turn mold our characters and influence our values. movies, as the new form of art and storytelling, have a likewise influence in shaping us. if someone enjoys certain books and movies, we can handily figure out who influenced them, and make a guess about their values and worldview. Let’s say, if a friend has an insatiable appetite for science fiction novels, he/she probably likes science subjects more than liberal arts and there’s also a good chance that he fancies the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Secondly, we are what we choose. reading books or watching movies is not merely a passive process. On the contrast, people actively make their choices based on their taste and values. As a result, if we are informed of what someone enjoys reading or watching, we can trace back about what their taste is. For instance, if a friend likes watching detective movies and reading detective novels, we can have an idea that he/she may as well likes riddles and puzzles, as riddles and puzzles share some commonality with detective novels in terms of the reasoning part.
To sum it up, books and movies people enjoy show their interests and tastes, and reading books and watching movies also shape their personality and values. In consequence, if we have a look at their read-list and watch-list, we can have a quite informative idea of who they are and what they like.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the books and movies the person likes. Firstly, as the saying goes, we are what...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Books
...s the saying goes, we are what we read. books, as the unparalleled form of human civi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
..., bear the wisdom of people in history. if we pour our heart into reading of class...
^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Movies
...ur characters and influence our values. movies, as the new form of art and storytellin...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('likewise') instead an adjective, or a noun ('influence') instead of another adjective.
... new form of art and storytelling, have a likewise influence in shaping us. if someone enjoys certai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Reading
...ey. Secondly, we are what we choose. reading books or watching movies is not merely ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, likewise, look, may, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.940625 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70531703029 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540625 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2145486897 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198382186372 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760073774479 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126379871341 0.0737576698707 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200794236386 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.182158711284 0.0645574589148 282% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.