Do you agree or disagree with the statement that government should do to improve the health care to clean the environment?
The government should be responsible to provide its citizens shelters, education facilities and work. Among all these responsibilities, a government should also step up efforts to upgrade the healthcare for its citizens. I believe that government should clean environment to improve people’s health. I will elaborate my reasons in the ensuing paragraphs.
First, water is the main source for spreading disease in the communities. If the government tries to provide clean water to people, then they will not get sick very often. People not only drink water every day, but they use it for many purposes like cooking, washing clothes, etc. Government has created organization who monitor the water purity. Water is not only the problem, nowadays, people do not even get clean air. Today, we see industries all over the places. They are not properly discarding their west. All industries produce different type of west. If it is not discarded properly then it pollutes air and water. Government should regulate industries which exert an important influence on people’s health. Massive industries often release poisonous gasses in the air, and in order to handle this situation, governments should establish regulations for these industries to decrease their pollutants.
Second, cleaning the environment is not enough but governments should also create awareness in people about benefits of clean environment. Make pure environment is not one day job, it requires long duration and lot of effort. If government give education to the people, then this work become lot easier for the government. For instance, Delhi has so much air pollution and because of that road traffic accidents had increased in recent years. In this case, people started car pooling to reduce traffic and air pollution in Delhi. Moreover, cleaning environment is not only governments responsibility, people should also participate in this action. If all people start growing tree, reduce energy consumption, reduce air pollution. All those effort put huge impact in protecting environment.
Let’s put in a nut shell, if government spend millions of dollars annually to buy equip hospitals, laboratories, but environment is not clean then there no use of all those facilities. Therefore, I strongly believe that government should clean environment first to improve citizens’ health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-10 | ankitapatel | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | ankitapatel | 76 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | ankitapatel | 86 | view |
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? 66
- Some people believe school cafeterias should stop selling soft drinks and other high sugar drinks while others think students should have a choice in what they drink Which option do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that television advertisements affect young children s behavior Please include reasons and examples in your answer 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they oppose specific points made in the reading.American literature of the early 20th century saw the rise of a number of influential authors writing in a new style. Ernest Hemingway, 3
- Classroom education is more helpful in life than lessons learned at home. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Use specific examples and reasons for your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 574, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...eover, cleaning environment is not only governments responsibility, people should also part...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 736, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this effort' or 'those efforts'?
Suggestion: this effort; those efforts
... consumption, reduce air pollution. All those effort put huge impact in protecting environme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 8.0752688172 359% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 365.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52328767123 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0327740018 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556164383562 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8847937833 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.64 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92 5.45110844103 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231764063216 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697467423323 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091054777811 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164677046179 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482775283254 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 58.1214874552 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.14 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.