Do you agree or disagree with this statement? The way a person dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, people pay a lot of attention on the outfit others wear. What a person wear is a good reflection of a person’s characteristic. Some people may agree that the way person dresses is a good indication of his or her personality, while others disagree with this idea. In my opinion, the outfit will definitely indicate a person’s personality.
First of all, if a person dress up neatly, that means this person has a well organised personality. To be more specific, we can feel that when a person dress more neatly, we will have a better impression on this person. When people with the personality of well organised want to dress up neatly, they will need to carefully pick the clothes that will match or have a better look, and pay more attention on the small parts to make sure there is no mistake. For example, when a businessman is well organised, he or she will always dress up neatly such as wearing a suit or a tie. They always wake up early in the morning to prepare for their day. Moreover, they will plan their daily schedule beforehand, so they always have time to prepare and dress up neatly. As a result, what one wear can indicate a person’s personality. Furthermore, a professional person such as a professor or a doctor will also dress up extremely neatly. Not only to make others have a better impression, but also show their organised personality in their own profession. Without a doubt, what one wear can explain what a person is. True, some people may disagree because they think a person will change their outfits depend on the places they go. However, even though people will change clothes when they go to a different place, they still have a style of outfit that they prefer to wear. As a result, when they change on this specific outfit again, we can still indicate their personality.
In addition, what a person wear can indicate this person’s personality might cause by certain stereotype. When a concept had become widely adopt by many people, more and more people will start thinking this concept is true. For example, we all think that a outgoing person are more likely to wear some fancy and colourful clothes, while others will wear clothes that are less dazzling. This is how people will react when they first see a person, and it means that people can indicate a person’s personality by looking at the style and color of a outfit. Gradually, this concept become more and more normal. What one wears is a good indication of a person’s personality.
Undoubtedly, some people may say that the way people dresses cannot indicate their personality because they might be in a rush and do not have time to prepare. However, if a person is well organised, he or she will wake up earlier to prepare. As a result, the person can still dress up neatly without the risk of running out of time. Indeed, I think that what a person wear is a fantastic reflection of a person’s personality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...is true. For example, we all think that a outgoing person are more likely to wear...
^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ty by looking at the style and color of a outfit. Gradually, this concept become ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, well, while, for example, i think, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 9.8082437276 275% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2436.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 516.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72093023256 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7725101788 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.383720930233 0.524837075471 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 775.8 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 12.0 3.51792114695 341% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.162939738 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2222222222 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.40740740741 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259024154203 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102751994626 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086399782171 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21656782612 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626343975789 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.63 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.