Do you agree or disagree?teachers should make their social or political views known to students in the classroom

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree?

teachers should make their social or political views known to students in the classroom

From many erudite thinker's points of view, although human is on the edge of civilization and stands on a pinnacle of wisdom, no one can turn a blind eye to the significance of social and political views on upbringing and developing student's points of view. Furthermore, in numerous circle of study and connoisseurs of the field, whereas some are inclined toward the opinion that teachers should make their social or political views known to students in the classroom, on the other extreme of the rope, some believe that teachers should create a free atmosphere for students to say their points of view free and allow them to explain and talk about different issues. While both sides take their own positions, from my vantage point, the latter group carries more weight and my reasons are discussed below.

The first exquisite reason of the current discussion which demands a keen contemplation is that students should have a freedom to say different points of view in a classroom and their teacher should not intricate them to a narrow point of view. Because freedom in saying idea lets the students improve their knowledge and pursue them to study more about that issue. For example, when you say your idea about the political issue in classroom freely, other students can listen and say their ideas and you can ameliorate your idea and study more to understand that issue. So a teacher can guide you but he should not force you to accept that view.

The second reason coming to my mind cogently to substantiate and vindicate my standpoint concerning this issue is that by saying different views without any obligation, the students can improve their self-confidence and be ready to go to future society. For instance, when the students take part in some special issues in class and say their view freely they can practice improving their self-confidence and social relationships. But if their teachers do not allow them to speak freely and force them to accept and agree to one view, they can not find themselves and imagine that they are not useful persons. So the teachers play a crucial role in the student's future.

To put everything in a nutshell a broad look over the main points and discussions reveals the fact that teachers should create a free atmosphere for students to say their points of view free and allow them to explain and talk about different issues. Actually, speaking in a free atmosphere can improve the student's knowledge and self-confidence and prepare them for future.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'freedom'.
Suggestion: freedom
...templation is that students should have a freedom to say different points of view in a cl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ng in a free atmosphere can improve the students knowledge and self-confidence and prepa...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, if, look, second, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 13.8261648746 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2082.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9219858156 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65877056408 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437352245863 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.970212033 48.9658058833 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.153846154 100.406767564 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5384615385 20.6045352989 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390027345125 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148493626275 0.076458572812 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890751122027 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239972343237 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809093921179 0.0645574589148 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 11.7677419355 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 10.002688172 280% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.