Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them? Use specific examples and evidences to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them? Use specific examples and evidences to support your answer.

Nowadays, people normally accept the truth that friends can affect on each other in a different situation, although some people have opposite opinion about this statement and declare this is not the correct idea. In my opinion, friends definitely imitate each other. That is due to having an enormous time with each other, their attractive behavior, and understanding the different points of each other.
First and foremost, when a person spends a specific time with another person, probably they mimic from each other. In otherwise, the mind of people without intention initiate to imitate from a person that they are together. For example, When I was a student at a university, I became familiar with a person. He was an addict. After several months I was addict due to I did not aware about the aftermath of my work. I have found that the friends have an immense effect on our activities.
Second, a person is enthusiastic about doing the work that their same-aged do. In other words, when they see some activities from their friends, they easily learn that and repeat in another situation. For instance, sometimes you have friends that they are attractive; hence, you try to repeat their work. I have a friend that he was a music player. I begin to play music due to emulating with him.
Finally, the friends usually know the characteristics of their friends; therefore, they will be able to train their friends from the corrected method. To put it differently, when you are aware of the weak point of a person, you can use his power points to make something easier for him. As an example, I have a friend that their score in his course was low; therefore, I decided to solve this problem. As we were intimate together, I understood the weak point of him; hence, I had tried to train him from the way that there were not his weak point.
As outlined above, it is obvious that friends are closer to each other rather than others; thus, they can affect each other easily. That is because of spending time together is the major cause of imitating, moreover, people always are keen on doing the behavior of friends and friends are aware of the properties of each other.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...mally accept the truth that friends can affect on each other in a different situation, al...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 326, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...miliar with a person. He was an addict. After several months I was addict due to I di...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ay that there were not his weak point. As outlined above, it is obvious that frie...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72631578947 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5192939696 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481578947368 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 559.8 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1228635889 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155165667248 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503618482372 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379710227098 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917078261487 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300946420447 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.