Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom you have not had classes before, or a course taught by a professor whose class you have taken before?
Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
It comes with no doubt that all professors are not the same in their teaching method. That is why it is important to choose classes with professors who we can achieve higher scores from. However, some people prefer to take classes with new professors, I would ratter to take part in courses that I had a class with their professor, before. I believe in this for two reasons that I am going to explore in this essay.
To commence with, it is obvious that when we had a class with a professor in advance, we would have known his favorite students. Some professors care highly about participating in lecture classes, nevertheless, some others do not care about it. Knowing your professor, you can make better decisions. My own experience is a compelling example of this. I used to take part in 3 different archaeology classes of a professor. He would never take care of our presence or absence in classes, he just required complete homework and good mark in the final exam therefore, I had not taken part in any lecture sessions and got great marks. My fourth course happened to be with a new professor, who had the opposite attitude about class participating. Make the long story short, I failed that course due to not taking part in even a single session. That is the reason I do not like courses that I do not know the Professor who teaches it.
In addition, the experiences of a class we had in a professor’s exams, are unbelievably helpful in his or her other exams. Each professor usually considers unique parts of a lesson more important to be learned by students. As a result, if we take a class with a professor whom we had a class with before, we will more probably know how his exams are. Hence, we can get better grades. For instance, A friend of mine had a geography class with a professor for the first time. In the final exam he could not answer the questions, despite he had studied a lot. Four semesters later, he had another course with the same professor, moreover, he knew which parts are more important to study. Which caused him to answer all the questions in the final exam.
In conclusion I prefer to take courses with professors whom I had a class before because of knowing what they like about their students and because I would know how to study for their exams.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hich parts are more important to study. Which caused him to answer all the questions ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54106280193 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61512894345 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478260869565 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6434094872 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4545454545 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86363636364 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357037041671 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105946097654 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715898485072 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229247876273 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380744098085 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.