Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom you have not had classes before or a course taught by a professor whose class you have taken before?Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
Teaching and Learning are the most important pillars for each society in today's world. Due to the fact, we live in a chaotic and fast-paced world, it is necessary for universities and colleges to have perfect faculty members who can connect with the students easily. In particular, this means they should spend more time rear and nurturing the students. A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether students should take courses taught by professors with whom they already know or whether they should take courses with professors whom they never have classes with them. Some people possess conviction that the former is more agreeable whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that the latter is more fruitful. I am personally content that this issue is multifaceted. Taking classes with professors that we never have had a class with them, makes some problems for us, especially, if we are in the last term. I would rather continue with the first approach. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind elucidating my standpoint is that if we take courses with professors that we know already, makes us feel better at the classes. Due to the fact, we are familiar with their teaching style, we can connect to lectures and courses efficiently. It doesn't take time to figure out how to connect with classes and the learning rate will be increased. Consider my personal experience to make this point more clear. In my first year of university, I took a class with Dr.Ahmadi who was very humble. He answered our questions in a friendly way and assigned us mini-projects for better understanding. Two years later, I mistakenly, choose another class with a new professor, instead taking a class with Dr.Ahmadi. Consequently, I felt sad in class and could not understand lectures well. It took several times until I followed up with the class.
The second rationale reason behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that some professors prefer to change their teaching style during a semester. It makes confusion for students. In some other respects, students discourage about their fields and majors. I think if students can feel comfortable in class, so they can ask questions and be active in class, and, equally important, after graduation, they can ask their professor recommender letter for the next steps.
In brief, Due to the aforementioned reasons, I prefer to take the class with professors that I already knowing them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...to lectures and courses efficiently. It doesnt take time to figure out how to connect ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 493, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Ahmadi
...r of university, I took a class with Dr.Ahmadi who was very humble. He answered our qu...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 547, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a friendly way" with adverb for "friendly"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... very humble. He answered our questions in a friendly way and assigned us mini-projects for bette...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 726, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Ahmadi
...ofessor, instead taking a class with Dr.Ahmadi. Consequently, I felt sad in class and ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, regarding, second, so, well, whereas, i think, in brief, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04460093897 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7674344004 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1856508536 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4347826087 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5217391304 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13043478261 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244223571536 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658601558137 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744790751405 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160964083703 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503764424893 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.