e-mail is the best way for communication between employees and their superiors, agree or disagree
Technology bringing about a lot of changes. One of these changes is e-mail. E-mail is a professional way to communicate with our bosses. Some people prefer direct communication with their superior. Personally, I concur with people who prefer using e-mails for connection. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will demonstrate in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, using e-mail for communication with our bosses is a professional way than direct talk. This is because people who are communicated directly with their bosses, they wasting their time, which thing has negative effect on their productivety and their success. My own experience is a compelling example of this. I am working on printing cases at big firm. Unfortuntly, my boss like to talk too much, which thing has negative effect on my work progress. This is cause me to stay more hours, or take my work with me to home to finish it. If my boss had not talk to much and use e-mail to communicated with me, I would not have finished my work late or took it home.
However, it is true people some time like to directly talk to their bosses for better understand. when people talk to each other directly is better to them to express themselves. On the other hand, using e-mail for communication with superior people is more formal than any other way. For example, last week, I was talk to my boss, and I asked him to increase my salary. He ignored my request. When I asked him why he did not responed to my request, he said because I did not send it to him by e-mail. So email more formal than any other way for formal communication.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that employees should use e-mail for communication with their bosses. this is because it is more professional.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onstrate in the following paragraphs. To begin with, using e-mail for communic...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'talked'.
Suggestion: talked
...o home to finish it. If my boss had not talk to much and use e-mail to communicated ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...e to finish it. If my boss had not talk to much and use e-mail to communicated wit...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nished my work late or took it home. However, it is true people some time lik...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
... to their bosses for better understand. when people talk to each other directly is b...
^^^^
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... request, he said because I did not send it to him by e-mail. So email more forma...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other way for formal communication. In conclusion, I strongly believe that e...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...il for communication with their bosses. this is because it is more professional.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, for example, i feel, in conclusion, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 309.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69579288026 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78267098683 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504854368932 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8573819728 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.9545454545 100.406767564 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0454545455 20.6045352989 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.40909090909 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231277268999 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795480738153 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799211697093 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184553789109 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489435239097 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 11.7677419355 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.