Essay topics: TPO-35 - Independent Writing Task
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no doubt that people's life in the future will become different from that of now. The cars and vehicles will encounter a lot of changes. This brings up a controversial question surrounding the use of car in the future: Is it true to claim that the number of cars in the next twenty years will be fewer than currently? In my perspective, I disagree with this stance that the cars will get lower. The reasons for this viewpoint are discussed in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the first thing that immediately comes to mind is that cost of fuel will decrease in the future. In fact, people currently cannot use their own car to drive to their career. They often are in financial pressure because of paying for compulsory expenses such as food and accommodation expenses. However, the scientists and oil companies are trying to find new ways to decrease production of fuels such as gasoline. The governments want to find new source all around the work in order to produce huge amount of gasoline to supply the needs for fuels. As the result of these measures done by companies as well as government, it is likely that cost of fossil fuels will drop and hence people will interested in using their car more than now.
The second and important reason that support my standpoint is that cars’ costs will drop in the next a few years. Indeed, a lot companies, which involve in the producing part of cars and vehicles are attempting to find new techniques to lower their cost of production, either by using low-cost energies such as solar energy or by reducing the process of objects production. Not only that but also car manufacturers are going to utilize automated machines including high technology machinery, robotic devices, which cause to decline of labor, which will in turn, diminish the money need for paying workers’ salaries. Therefore, if the labor decrease, the final price of cars will decrease. Consequently, the money that people spend for purchasing a car or van will be lower than today.
On the other hand, there is one justification that lead onto that individuals do not drive personal car, which is availability of public transportation. Indeed, government of one of populated country in the world, namely Chine, are investing money on developing new kind of transportation system. This new aforementioned system will allow the passengers to arrive to their destinations early than before. Therefore, other countries will become interested to develop such kind of transportation system, and thus this will result in rapid decline on the personal car uses.
In conclusion, according to above-mentioned factors, I contend that individuals in the twenty years, would like to drive more cars, because of the decrease in the price of fossil fuels and cars. Why will be the cars fewer for use, when its price plummet?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 195, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are often
... own car to drive to their career. They often are in financial pressure because of paying...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 709, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'interest'
Suggestion: interest
...l fuels will drop and hence people will interested in using their car more than now. The ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'declining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: declining
...machinery, robotic devices, which cause to decline of labor, which will in turn, diminish ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, no doubt, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2380.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 481.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94802494802 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8263878428 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517671517672 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 734.4 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1456378059 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.181818182 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8636363636 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.31818181818 5.45110844103 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205515880851 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679800578939 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582421766108 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124019667195 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620199496903 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.