TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no doubt that today there are a lot universities around the global. The college professors have a significant role in amending education quality. This brings up a controversial question regarding to salary of professors: Is it a good idea that universities escalate professors' wages? In my perspective, I disagree with the idea of dedicating budget to increase professors' salary. The reasons for this viewpoint are discussed in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the first thing that immediately comes to mind is that university could spend money for providing financial support for students. In fact, nowadays students are more in monetary pressure than past time. The reason for this are not only universities’ higher tuition fees, but costs of living is also high. Students should pay accommodation expenses as well as other compulsory expenses themselves. As a result of this, students intend to work in part-time job in order to be able to pay their education expenses. However, working at a part-time job brings them problems surrounding studying. For instance, they sleep late at night or do not able to participate in all of classes. If the universities consider to supply financial aids for students, they can study well. Consequently, their grades will improve substantially.
The second and important reason that support my standpoint is that universities could improve quality of education by allocating money for buying equipment. Indeed, all of the courses concerning with the applied sciences such as engineering required to have special instrument, while there are a few colleges in all around the world, which owned enough laboratory equipment. By purchasing new devices for practical courses, students could grasp practical knowledge better. For example, when I was a university student, our department do not have sufficient devices for doing experiments and thus all of students in the class should work in a group, which only a few students were able to do the experiment and others were like visitors. Consequently, most students could not obtain experience in working with lab devices. Therefore, dedicating money for supplying laboratory devices and equipment is a good way to improve quality of education.
On the other hand, there is a good justification for devoting some money for professors. In fact, professors in the universities educate people, and if they have higher salary, they can use various techniques for teaching students. They can make a use of strategies that causes to students comprehend class materials well. So, it is plausible that some students understand lectures well. However, rising professors' salaries more than a specific amount will make student become deprive from the financial support and learning facility.
In conclusion, according to the above-mentioned factors, I contend that university should spend money on providing financial aids as well as improving university facilities, although college managers should consider a slight change in the professors’ wage, as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 464, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... discussed in the following paragraphs. To begin with, the first thing that imme...
^^^^
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ents are more in monetary pressure than past time. The reason for this are not only unive...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ing money for buying equipment. Indeed, all of the courses concerning with the applied sci...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2593.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45894736842 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10472002387 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515789473684 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 808.2 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6370316421 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7307692308 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2692307692 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.65384615385 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212899909877 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582570149878 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516637836995 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129678722429 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238863064185 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.