Famous entertainers and athletes should have more privacy than they have today. Do you agree or disagree? State your opinion with relevant reasons.
Being famous and staying in the limelight is no as easy as it may sound. To keep up in the show business, one has to give media a good lot of content yet not at the cost of trading details of their personal life. Hence, I completely agree that famous entertainers and athletes should have more privacy than they have today. In what follows, I'll note down a few points to help explain the reasons behind my stand.
To begin with, every human ought to have their privacy rights, no matter whether they are celebrities or not, because everyone wants to enjoy a personal life without anyone's interference within it. Considered as influential being, when celebrities are under the constant scrutiny of media and paparazzi, they have to maintain their appearances all the time. Let's take an example of the snide and ridiculous headlines of a British tabloid which questioned that why can't the Duchess of Sussex keep her hands off her baby bump. Media could be quite insensitive at times and that is why famous people should be demand for more privacy.
Secondly, it can put any human being under sheer pressure when their secrets are open to public access. We generally share our deepest desires and feelings with only the closest people in our lives and not with everyone, to relieve ourselves from receiving nasty judgements or unnecessary pity from individuals around. Let's take an example of a young Indian Bollywood actor named Sushant Singh Rajput who had committed suicide a few months back. He was always posing a happy face in front of the camera and tried to hide the fact that he was suffering from depression to avoid receiving any criticism from the general public and media houses. This shows how the lack of privacy in one's life can lead to a stressful existence.
Last but not least, media should spare some primetime to read out news of national importance rather than just showing insignificant private details of celebrities and their lifestyle. Because of their strategy to cover up the lack of news content they have, with celebrity gossips, it ends up creating a wrong impression in the mid of young generation of what news is important and what is not. Let's say for example that how media these days have grown a penchant for the children of celebrities. Once a newsreader had asked to bring the actor his one-year-old child in front of the camera in the middle of a serious primetime debate. If such callousness continues, people will lose understanding the significance of news altogether.
To conclude, media coverage is both a boon and a curse for any famous entertainer or any athlete out there. But it is also upon the media houses and the public, in general, to respect the privacy of our beloved celebrities for obvious reasons mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...aintain their appearances all the time. Lets take an example of the snide and ridicu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...itish tabloid which questioned that why cant the Duchess of Sussex keep her hands of...
^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'demanded'?
Suggestion: demanded
...and that is why famous people should be demand for more privacy. Secondly, it can p...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...necessary pity from individuals around. Lets take an example of a young Indian Bolly...
^^^^
Line 5, column 611, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... avoid receiving any criticism from the general public and media houses. This shows how the la...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 682, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
.... This shows how the lack of privacy in ones life can lead to a stressful existence....
^^^^
Line 7, column 397, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...what news is important and what is not. Lets say for example that how media these da...
^^^^
Line 7, column 499, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nchant for the children of celebrities. Once a newsreader had asked to bring the act...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8322851153 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60087037733 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570230607966 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 727.2 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8213418325 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.85 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214775760024 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667477206043 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124342570554 0.0737576698707 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128799774925 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902051620098 0.0645574589148 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.