Has the ease of cooking improved life?
Accessibility to food is one of the greatest wants of humankind. We need food as a resource of energy for our health body to keep living and doing work. Nowadays, with the advancement in technology, preparing food has become easier than in the past. Definitely, some people if asked would agree with the statement that the ease of cooking improved life, while others have a negative attitude. In my opinion, this change has improved the way of our life but also has the adverse influence on our life.
The first and most exquisite point to be mentioned is that this change can help people save their time by doing works that are more necessary. Basically, the process of preparing food is cumbersome and time-consuming. Currently, people work fulltime and they do not have enough time to cook. Most people use Semi-prepared food that is easy to access in many supermarkets. Also, advanced technology comes to help to cook faster, technology machines like microwave declined during the time of cooking. In contrast to the past that people had to ready many of materials for cooking furthermore, without technology the process of making cuisine was long. As you see this change has the positive effect on improving our life.
On the other side, this change has the negative effect on our health and relationship between family members. Many people due to easy access to restaurant and food court use junk food and fast-food that these foods are high calorie, low food quality with the low amount of vitamins and minerals. Consequently, as researches show, many of people in the societies encounter with uncontrolled weight gain that would cause many of diseases like cardiovascular disease, diabetes and so on. Additionally, people with the heavy amount of daily workload usually prefer eating out due to the easy access to food, so family members do not gather together to eat lunch or dinner. I believe that eating with family is one of the ways that can help strengthen the family bonds. Unlike today, in the past most of the family members with help each other provide food although it is time-consuming and hard they enjoyed to be together.
In sum up, although the ease of preparing food facilities the way of our life especially in today world because of the limit of time for making food but many of foods that people consume have low food quality and can cause many of health problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 652, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...the process of making cuisine was long. As you see this change has the positive ef...
^^
Line 3, column 896, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'enjoyed being'.
Suggestion: enjoyed being
...ough it is time-consuming and hard they enjoyed to be together. In sum up, although the ease...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd can cause many of health problems.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, then, while, in contrast, in contrast to, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86797066015 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64528243188 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498777506112 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1545135769 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.789473684 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5263157895 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15980595788 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584457361648 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997730301105 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128428390161 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105448454442 0.0645574589148 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.