history courses should be required in universities or not
Whether an obligatory history course serves the students with benefits or it is a drawback cannot be easily determines. Many objectives have to be taken into account and people's view may differ greatly. The answer to this question depends to a great extent on lens through which one is looking at the purpose of history. All that said, I believe that every student should take a history course in their academic setting and as a part of their mandatory requirements. I will elaborate further as follows.
First, although history can be regarded as a record of past events in countries and around the world, its contributes to expanding and individuals horoizons does not end there. History teaches us about our past, our ancestors, the events in our culture and around the world, which are all factors that shaped today's universe. Looking at the world with the assistance of history provides us with a deep insight that goes beyond the events themselves, but recognizes the causal conditions that led to that event. Additionally, history can be full of lessons that help individuls in their personal lives and interactions with the world. In my opinion, there are innumerable benefits in learning history. However, because university students are typically young people with few life experiences and limited insight, they might not realize the advantages of learning history yet. Therefore, making history courses part of their obligatory curriculum can be beneficial for them later in life in many aspects. For instance, I have a brother who used to attend a lot of parties in his college years, and he was not interested in reading any material other than ones his university required. As he had a national history course as part of his required curriculum, he had to study this material extensively, which in turn mad him very interested in this subject which was previously unfamiliar to him.
Secondly, as university courses are usually well-supervised and undergo a lot of revisions and screening processes, and also, university professors are selected based on their merit and knowledge very cautiosly, the university can be the most proper environment to make sure students receieve adequate, accurate, and impartial information in history. There are many groups of people and books which present their own biased version of the history in the attemp of luring people, especially young impresionable generations, towards their own political and social views. In contrast, universities can provide a safe reliable source for students to learn about the true events of the past. This is indeed a chance that is almost quite lost upon graduation. As an example, referring to myself, I could take an elective history course in the university when I was a student, but I did not realize the importance of this course at the moment, and I did not take it. Today, as I have little knowledge about history, I am eager to learn but I cannot seem to find reliable accurate sources.
In conclusion, as history is full of advantageous lessons and universities can be a proper environment for learning that lessons in an unbiased way, I believe history should be a required obligatory course in universities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...orld, which are all factors that shaped todays universe. Looking at the world with the...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unbiased way" with adverb for "unbiased"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r environment for learning that lessons in an unbiased way, I believe history should be a required...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2686.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 527.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09677419355 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88031790228 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508538899431 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 869.4 618.680645161 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.709161952 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.904761905 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0952380952 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38095238095 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393753230397 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10245829641 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107909205159 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287859171797 0.150856017488 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107566062654 0.0645574589148 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.