If you are required to give feedback about your classmates/colleagues (work or performance), would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first?
Recently the phenomenon of giving feedback has sparked a heated debate. In this connection, there are several avenues to present ideas on peoples' performance. Although contested by many that the matter of giving a positive opinion about coworkers at first is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that expressing negative comments after positive ones can be a plus, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
Firstly, if people understand that positive aspects of their job are observed, they will encourage them to continue them, so it is useful feedback. To be more specific, by mentioning one's plus abilities, they grasp which skills is beneficial; thus, pay attention to either enhance them or maintain them. As a person who is respected for positive characteristics feels enthusiastic, they enjoy learning about their negative behaviors without any frustrating feelings. According to my own experience, my manager holds a meeting every month to instigate our duties. When he approves of our work, all the colleagues feel energetic, and they aware that their efforts are monitored and be praised, so we try to keep our positive abilities. After the manager finishes his supportive comments, all of the workers ask him about their negative parts themselves because they spur to revise these parts. Therefore, they will be acclaimed at the next meetings more than before.
Secondly, commenting on the positive aspects of people make them feel confident, which improves their creativity. To elucidate, people who are innovative dare to present unique ideas in public because they won't blame them if something goes wrong. For example, when I was a high school student, I felt timid expressing my mathematics solutions to our teacher because she would tease us if we solved problems incorrectly. Therefore, pupils did not speak about their new answers during a class. Although students got good grades in exams, the teacher would felt angry even if one problem solved wrong. Gradually our confidence diminished, so much so that we could not have a debate on our innovative instructions; otherwise, we could develop our notions by amending them according to the teacher and other students' bits of help.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that pointing to positive sides is helpful feedback. Not only do positive comments guide people toward improvement in performing tasks, but it also prevents them from feeling embarrassed to discuss ideas.
Comments
Some of the easy topics you…
Some of the easy topics you start to get some helping thoughts. It really matters whenever you start to show you helping essayshift.com data which are really good when and where you start to take or to find many tips to get many helping thoughts for you.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ack. To be more specific, by mentioning ones plus abilities, they grasp which skills...
^^^^
Line 3, column 787, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...nager finishes his supportive comments, all of the workers ask him about their negative pa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m feeling embarrassed to discuss ideas.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2198.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29638554217 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85318299716 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607228915663 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.876116207 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.684210526 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8421052632 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63157894737 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164240847539 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500719356802 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463025256275 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112165015326 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574973968194 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.