Imagine that a professor requires students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of life. Is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or is it better to require students to work alone?
Since the dawn of civilization, human beings have been perpetually seeking the approaches that pave the way for learning a subject. In such a sophisticated world in the modern era, such efforts have been widely considered of paramount importance for students since the quality of education has played a prominent role in changing each individual's life. The disputatious question which arises in this regard is whether working together in a group contributes more to learning a lesson in a small period or working alone. Although some people are the leading proponent of the latter, I firmly contend that the former has more advantages for students than the latter. In what follows, I will elaborate on two reasons to elucidate my standpoint aptly.
The first and foremost reason why students should study together is it enables them to overcome their weaknesses. In fact, students prefer to ask their questions from their peers rather than asking them from their teachers since their teachers have hectic daily schedules which prevent them from answering students' questions. Consequently, when they study in a group, they can ask questions from the group members whenever they encounter a problem. Working alone, however, students cannot solve their issues. As an illustration, consider my personal experience as a compelling example. When I was 14, I faced a problem in solving a math equation. Had I not had anyone to ask for help, I would not have learned the math concepts taught in the next term. In addition, solving their issues enables students to improve the areas they need development. It shows us that they can learn topics sooner.
Another noteworthy reason for working with others is students understand the ins and outs of theories and concepts more effectively. It is because group members motivate each other to study regularly and keep track of topics. Some may argue that by studying alone, students focus on topics better, but I posit that this way, any unimportant stuff will deviate the student's attention from topics nevertheless. To illustrate it, one can point out recent and comprehensible research related to the discussion. Some eminent researchers at the Center of Education Studies of the University of Tehran have concluded that around half of students do not study lessons when they are alone. For example, they use their cell phones or play online games. It tells us that if students study alone, it takes a longer period.
To sum up, considering all the aforementioned reasons, one can surmise that studying with others can lead to learning in short periods of time. It is because it not only helps students to overcome their weaknesses but also enables them to understand topics better. It is highly anticipated that if a school asks students to study in a group, students will take all courses required for graduation much sooner. Without a shadow of a doubt, it is just a story in a nutshell, and there are other reasons that challenge this. Therefore, I recommend that a survey evaluating the effectiveness of points is held.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...layed a prominent role in changing each individuals life. The disputatious question which a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...arly and keep track of topics. Some may argue that by studying alone, students focus ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... any unimportant stuff will deviate the students attention from topics nevertheless. To ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in fact, in short, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2561.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 506.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06126482213 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76831480185 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53162055336 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 784.8 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9218045179 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11538461538 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278054168877 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070741858582 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654386546633 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17572323616 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338414189707 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.