Imagine that a professor requires students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of life. Is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or is it better to require students to work alone?
In this modern day and age, education plays a critical role in preparing students for their future lives and teachers try to provide children with the most efficient teaching methods to help pave the way for them to forge a path forward to a fulfilling life. The importance in this regard often leads to serious controversies such as will the student's learning improves if they are asked to work in close tandem together or rather it is better to leave them to learn everything on their own in a limited time? Personally, though, I utterly subscribe to this idea that perhaps a combination of both works the best. To discuss this, there are several perspectives, two of dominant which are discussed in detail in the following.
First and foremost, the advantages of teamwork are almost proved to everyone and group discussions can help students broaden their horizons and enhance their knowledge on a certain topic. In case individuals encounter problems in the process of learning, they can ask for their peers' help. This would save them a significant amount of time since specific academic materials are sometimes too complex to be absorbed in a relatively short time. A recent research conducted at the Sharif University of Technology yields several interesting statistics, in one of which, it is stated that the remarkable four out of five students who were put in different groups and were asked to help each other learn a certain academic topic, confirmed that they have perfectly reaped the benefits of this group work and the improvements in their grades validates this claim. The results, paint a vivid portrait of the importance of teamwork in enhancing learning.
On the other hand, in order to gain profound knowledge on specific subjects, students should spend some time on their own, thoroughly evaluating all sides of an academic subject to be assured that they have almost mastered the topic and it has been totally established in their brains. Most of the primary school's students often feel ashamed to ask their colleagues to explain something which has been ambiguous to them over and over again as they feel like this might leave a bad impression on other students, making them think that person is not clever enough. As a consequence, they might lie to their peers that everything is clear although this may not be true at all. Therefore, it is recommended that teachers tell their students in case they have any problem and they don't feel comfortable sharing this with their colleagues, your teacher will always be there for you and you should not worry about it at all
To wrap it up, contemplating on what was discussed above, there are both advantages and setbacks in requiring students to work in groups. Although it is no secret that teamwork can be extremely beneficial and enhances the process of learning as the students would step up and help each other in case of problem, one should bear in mind that some students, especially those in primary school, might feel too shy to ask their peers help them with something because they don't want to exhibit a not-so-much-bright character. It is suggested for the teachers to tailor a thoughtful teamwork plan which also covers the aforementioned concern.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 776, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... in case they have any problem and they dont feel comfortable sharing this with thei...
^^^^
Line 4, column 469, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s help them with something because they dont want to exhibit a not-so-much-bright ch...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, so, therefore, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 52.1666666667 159% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2691.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 544.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94669117647 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82947280553 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73676073012 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507352941176 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 814.5 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.1344086022 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.872419173 48.9658058833 226% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 179.4 100.406767564 179% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.2666666667 20.6045352989 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176631438051 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566911834472 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521429612293 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117507186723 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365139273031 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 11.7677419355 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.0537634409 163% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.247311828 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.