Reading and lecturing are both about perusers. Petrosarvars were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived next to dinosaurs. The professor disagrees with the claims made in the article.
First, ancient reptiles, such as pterosaurs, were read as cold-blooded animals, and the article notes that cold-blooded animals usually have a slow metabolism that reduces energy production. However, it seemed unlikely that pterosaurs would be able to produce the energy needed to fly. This particular argument is challenged by the speaker. The professor claims that some recently discovered pterosaur fossils show that the pterosaurs had a dense, hair-like covering, somewhat like fur. He further argues that the hair or fur covering is usually warm-blooded for animals. If pterosaurs are warm-blooded animals, then they have the energy to fly with energy.
The article states that there is a limit to the number of animals that can be held in the air with a heavy flight that they cannot stretch their wings long enough to stay high for any length of time., However, claims that the bones of the pterosaurs were hollow rather than solid. The hollow, lightweight bones could keep the weight of the pterosaurs low despite the large body frames.
Finally, the author assumes that we know from fossilized bones that the muscles in the back of their legs are so small and weak that they do not allow the pterosaurs to run fast enough or to rise high enough to pull themselves into the air. In contrast, the speaker's position differs significantly between birds and pterosaurs. Birds only use their hind limbs to walk on the ground. So, they only have two limbs to move away from when throwing. But the pterosaurs walked on all four limbs while on the ground. So, they could fly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, so, then, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1977.66487455 67% => OK
No of words: 266.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95488721805 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54890544925 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 618.680645161 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.0143961203 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1428571429 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.076472518397 0.236089414692 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0203224358221 0.076458572812 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357606874496 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0532221194036 0.150856017488 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377557824957 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.