Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade
-Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Teachers and leaders of meeting are also ordinary people, and it is unavoidable for them to make mistakes. And, there are many ways for us to correct the mistakes they made. In my opinion, if I were in a class or a meeting, my teacher says something incorrect in my opinion, I will wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
That is because by doing this way teacher or meeting leader will not feel that they lost their face. It can also help people leave a good impression to teacher and meeting leader so can earn more chance to success. This argument will serve me better if we consider me as an example. When I was a senior in Peking University, I was good at history, and I always got an A in historical classes. Professor Chen was erudite and he was the teacher I respected most. I liked taking his class, and it seems professor Chen appreciated me a lot since he often asked me to answer his questions. Once, professor Chen asked when Li longji, who was a famous emperor in tang dynasty, had become an emperor. I answered 712 AC, but professor corrected it as 702 AC. I searched it on internet immediately, and found out I was right. However, I didn't interrupt right away, since professor Chen has enter the next part. After the end of the class, I found professor and told him about the mistake. Professor smiled and said thanks that I did not interrupt right away which will disturb the class. After that, professor Chen seems more believe me as he invited me to enter his research group. So, you can see, if we corrected the mistakes after the meeting or class, we can leave a good impression to teacher or leader, and easily success.
Admittedly, interrupted immediately can help correct the mistake, so no one in the class or meeting will keep the wrong impression or be confused about your opinion. However, it brings bad influence to you, making your teacher or the meeting leader lose face is not good for you to get their appreciation. Waiting until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader does not mean that not to correct the mistakes, the teacher can correct it next time in class and the meeting leader can send email to members attend the meeting or give correction in next meeting. So, you still have chance to change others opinion of your opinion. Besides, I think saying nothing is the worse idea among these 3 solutions. That is because, say nothing will keep people misunderstanding your opinion, it will make trouble to you. Teacher may consider you did not do study well, and the meeting leader may recognize you as a slapdash people. This impression will not change if you keep silence.
Therefore, I prefer to wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'an' or 'A' is left.
Suggestion: an; A
...I was good at history, and I always got an A in historical classes. Professor Chen w...
^^^^
Line 5, column 829, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
..., and found out I was right. However, I didnt interrupt right away, since professor C...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 882, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'entered'.
Suggestion: entered
...pt right away, since professor Chen has enter the next part. After the end of the cla...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, well, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 13.8261648746 231% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 43.0788530466 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2377.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 523.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54493307839 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45523518779 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441682600382 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 731.7 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5622845875 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4230769231 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1153846154 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61538461538 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4212578792 0.236089414692 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110286577806 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991183814939 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298029741461 0.150856017488 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872852025622 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.