Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the development of the modern society, workers’ rights are well guaranteed. As they are better paid than before, workers begin paying more attention to their feeling during working. Satisfaction has become an important concern which workers care about. It is not surprise that someone, if not the workers, argue that workers are more satisfied when doing similar tasks all day long, since the jobs is so easy to complete. However, in my opinion, workers will be more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday.
In the first palace, the main reason for my propensity is that workers need the sense of achievement to relieve their exhaustion, and they can acquire the sense of achievement from Finnish different working assignments. The novelty is the constant power of workers’ satisfaction. This argument will serve me better if we consider the example of my friend Amy. Last year, she worked in factory, and her assignment is assembling a computer keyboard. She did like the job at first because she had never done this before, however, after repeating so many times, she found herself tried about this job. She said repeating the assembling process make herself like a machine, no feeling, no thought, and it was really boring. She told to the leader of her group about her feeling, the leader make a difference. He ruled his group member need to change their job with each other twice a week. After that, Amy become more excited about her job, and shared her satisfaction with me after she had finally completed an unfamiliar task. In contrast, doing the same task all day along will quickly make workers wear out and vapid, because there is no novelty left in their work. Therefore, workers will be more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday.
What is more, doing different tasks can help workers keep curiosity about their jobs, and curiosity is an important part of resource of satisfaction. During the process of task, curiosity becomes a motivation, making workers consider his work as a funny task. My experience can well attest to my opinion. I used to be a weaving worker in a sweater factory. My job is ironing sweaters before they entered into market. To be honest, this job was so simple, so I was familiar with it just in 2 days. After the curiosity passed by, I felt vapid about my job, and lost my working passion. My boss found out, and I asked if the factory can change my job every few weeks since I was so curious about other jobs. With the permission, I tried so many novelties. As I became more excited, I did a good job in the factory as I improve my efficiency more than 20 percent. In contrast, doing the same task all day along will decrease one’s working passion as the curiosity passed by soon. So workers won't feel satisfied during their jobs. In consequence, I believe doing different tasks is better.
In a nutshell, Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, argue that workers are more satisfied when doing similar tasks all day long, s...
^^^
Line 1, column 505, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...s will be more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of tasks to do during the workday. In the first palace, the main reason for...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y is the constant power of workers' satisfaction. This argument will serve m...
^^^
Line 5, column 733, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
..., no thought, and it was really boring. She told to the leader of her group about h...
^^^
Line 5, column 1236, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...s will be more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es of tasks to do during the workday. What is more, doing different tasks can ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ieve doing different tasks is better. In a nutshell, Workers are more satisfie...
^^^^
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rkers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, really, so, therefore, well, in contrast, in fact, in my opinion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2563.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 538.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76394052045 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55463983472 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453531598513 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 794.7 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1139473496 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4333333333 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.56666666667 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407282717622 0.236089414692 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124241385415 0.076458572812 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18734549196 0.0737576698707 254% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.416877634515 0.150856017488 276% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.250125021543 0.0645574589148 387% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.