Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
--Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
--Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
--Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People possess different perspectives while correcting others' mistakes. Some people may choose to correct them right way, others may be silent because they do not want to challenge other people. In my perspective, I prefer not to be silent and I would interrupt them or talk to them personally based on different circumstances.
First of all, it is beneficial for both lecturers and listeners to learn the correct information right away in the classroom. To be more specific, if I am aware that the presenters convey false information, I should correct them in case the lecturers keep spreading false information and other listeners will get something wrong. For example, I once corrected my professor in his data structure course. At the beginning, I was struggling about whether I should interrupt him because it seems impolite to correct teachers in my culture. Surprisingly, my professor and my classmates thanked me because of my decision to correct the teaching material. If I choose to be silent, the false information would keep spread out in all of the students of the professor.
Second, I would choose to talk to meeting leaders in a polite way after the meeting is over, especially in the commercial and business meeting because the meeting in commercial and business sometimes include complex business strategy. It is hard to tell whether the meeting leaders choose to tell incorrect information or not. For instance, when I was an intern in a trading company, I joined the price negotiation meeting with my manager. During the meeting, the customers would ask about the price we sold to other customers, because they wanted to ask for a discount. My manager will choose to tell a lie because we should try to get more benefit from consumers. If I corrected my manager right away, I would interrupt his strategy. So I would talk to him after the meeting is over to make sure the information is intended to be incorrect or it is a strategy.
To sum up, I would never be silent and I would interrupt them or talk to them personally based on different circumstances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 723, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...se information would keep spread out in all of the students of the professor. Second, I...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a polite way" with adverb for "polite"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...would choose to talk to meeting leaders in a polite way after the meeting is over, especially i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, while, for example, for instance, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90934844193 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92615226607 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450424929178 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5692193817 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.941176471 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7647058824 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190449213007 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661232549476 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063037702904 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980817761821 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792804591848 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.