Imagine that your city government has given permission for a major company to build a large factory near your neighborhood. Do you think this is a good idea? Why or why not?
Factories, as we all know, for the majority of nations, are the most crucial parts of their production and economy. Due to its paramount importance, efforts for elevating its effectiveness have always been the top priority of sociologists. In this regard, many people support this opinion that constructing a factory even near the homelands is favorable. Similarly to common belief, I believe that building a factory provides jobs and better economic circumstances both for local people and for society as a whole. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that constructing a factory even near my neighborhood is beneficial is related to the job. Regarding the situation my country has, every province, especially small ones, endure from unemployment. Thus all positive steps toward providing jobs are advantageous. Crowd and population is the negative side of the presence of a factory in a place, though. Without a doubt, building a factory can provide many jobs at least for local people. Therefore, the benefits of having a factory in the neighborhood, in comparison with the absence of it, convince people to be welcoming toward building a new factory. Take my personal experience as an example. A couple of years ago, when I was younger than now, I needed a job and I could not find one. One of the friends of mine, who lives near a factory, and I never like the weather around her home though; she proposed me to fill the factory employment application. Fortunately, I was accepted into that factory. Despite the fact that the factory makes the area polluted, I always ask myself what would have happened to me if there had not been a factory near my friend`s home? Needless to say, having a job is crucial.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is that a factory can raise the production rate. Undoubtedly, constructing a new factory provides a better situation for domestic production and makes a much more quantity of goods. Moreover, as a result of more production, society has flourished, and employees have been paid better. The more goods a community can produce, the more economic exchange and prosperity it achieves. Although many critics challenge this idea and debate that a new factory means contaminated weather, the satisfaction that emanated from the better economic situation every individual enjoys in society reminds positive aspects of the industry.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that the benefits of building a new factory even near the residential areas, outweigh its disadvantageous. Indeed, a new factory means more jobs and more prosperity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...y even near the homelands is favorable. Similarly to common belief, I believe that buildi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...y small ones, endure from unemployment. Thus all positive steps toward providing job...
^^^^
Line 9, column 674, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...minds positive aspects of the industry. To summarize, contemplating all remarks,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, therefore, thus, at least, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2281.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16063348416 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00465095412 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 734.4 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3769200021 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0416666667 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54166666667 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146442951035 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400847556876 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355038969802 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940299296601 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246486869065 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.