In terms of government expenses, which one is preferable? Is it better to spend money on new buildings or refund the old projects?
Refund the old projects are not so important as new buildings are. As we all know, one of the most expenses of government in each country is on buildings. Due to the paramount importance of governmental expenses, efforts for elevating its effectiveness have always been among the top priorities of sociologists. In this regard, many people believe that the government should refund the old projects. Contrary to common belief, I believe that spend money on new buildings has numerous beneficial effects. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoints.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that constructing new building is important is related to authenticity of a city. What makes a city beautiful and up to dated, is urban designing in which constructing building included. A design that transform a big city to a metropolitan one. Undoubtedly, constructions like bridge and sky scrapers not only make beautiful eye sights for a city but also make it looks like a developed city. Take my personal experience as an example. A couple of years ago, I used to travel a lot, I always consider cities that have such elements as an updated and facilitated place, and an epitome of a new era. I often preferred to travel to these destinations.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is the modern era needs. Without a doubt, we are living in a period that technology have changed everything, jobs as well. To illustrate, these days, career are more complex and traumatic. So, people need to work in a more complicated and developed work place. A place that not only fulfills the job requirements but also provides a good environment for employees. So, it is far rational for government to build buildings that can meet these needs. Although many critics may challenge this idea and debate that the nature of work is the same as what was existed previously, and there is no need to change workplace because new circumstances may cause some confusion, the current trend of new jobs that are created every decades show the increasing need of societies to satisfy this need. Scientifically speaking, employees are much more exposed to stress. The more modern job a person has, the more stress he or she endured. Thus, it show the necessary need of constructing new buildings that care about the new situations.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that the favorable effects of new buildings and the current situation of societies make it critical for governments to pay more attention on constructing new ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: EYE_BROW[1]
Message: This word is usually spelt together: 'eyesights'.
Suggestion: eyesights
...nd sky scrapers not only make beautiful eye sights for a city but also make it looks like ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vides a good environment for employees. So, it is far rational for government to...
^^
Line 9, column 987, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'shows'?
Suggestion: shows
...more stress he or she endured. Thus, it show the necessary need of constructing new ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the favorable effects of new buildings and the current situation of societies m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, then, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01851851852 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98197028429 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553240740741 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5838111603 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3333333333 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.20833333333 5.45110844103 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244201587418 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063325442242 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776134173414 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149398986583 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931169620423 0.0645574589148 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.