Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading claims that there is a suitable replacement for the internal combustion engine. IT introduces a new engine and considered numerous advantageous for this hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine. However the lecturer is agreed with some points of presence in the passage, she brings contrary facts.
The author argues that there is a great amount of source of hydrogens such as natural gas and even water. The speaker claims that although there is an optimistic viewpoint about hydrogen this engine is not the solution because the pure liquid hydrogen is not easily available and plentiful sources of it are not directly useable. Also, she argues that this pure liquid substance is hard to maintain and needs lots of effort.
Secondly, the passage claims that this new engine will solve the pollution problem. But, the narrator believes that the process of producing hydrogen will be contain burning oil or fuel. Although the engine merely does not use petroleum, the process of producing hydrogen not provide unless burning fuels and creating pollutions.
The last reason which passage provide is the competitiveness of fuel-cell engines. It believes that this engine is economically favorable because it requires half the fuel that the internal combustion needs to go to the same distance. Although the lecturer knows about the benefits of these engines, she believes that the manufacturing of these kinds of engines is expensive and all efforts for reducing the costs are unsuccessful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...r this hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine. However the lecturer is agreed with some points...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40506329114 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75406891398 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544303797468 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9222798437 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.035341025877 0.272083759551 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0158504534821 0.0996497079465 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325365245548 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0253507984949 0.162205337803 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350075585601 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.