Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.

Education, as we all know, is the modern human being`s wealth. Although it may seem exaggerated, at first sight, one may find the debate about it sensible. In this regard, many people support this opinion that for the successful development of a country, it is far better the government spends money on education from childhood. Similarly, I believe that education in the childhood period besides bringing better abilities is important from the psychological viewpoint, either. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.

The first reason that makes me hold the belief that it is important to spend money on education from a very young age is the instinct ability of children in learning. Undoubtedly, childhood is everything. Scholars believe that every individual map the future just based on the experiences she achieved in the first ages. Although many critics challenge this idea and try to focus on teenage ages as a secondary determining period of each person`s life, nowadays, people believe that children in comparison with adults or teenagers have a greater ability in learning. The more a child exposed to the advanced teaching tools, the better the student she could be in the future and also the better sufficiency she will show at the young ages. Moreover, people inborn with the natural instinct to be superior through education can achieve this desire. Based on an experiment that has been done recently on the children in different educational situations, results showed that children who have a better educational system show better performance in their schools soon after entering it.

Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is the psychological aspect of educating children from very young ages. Through understanding simple characteristics children have, it would be easier to understand their talent and even shape new abilities for them. Indeed, parents can inform about the area that their child is the best and by providing a suitable situation to guide their child on the right path. The more a person can use her ability and talent, the more satisfaction will endure in her life. The more satisfies residents will move society to the healthy with high levels of life quality. Take my personal experience as an example, a couple of years ago, when I was in high school, one of the friends of mine sister was a child, and I understand they planned a schedule to prepare her some kinds of skills. Today, as a young woman, I hear that she becomes a great painter, and I understand it would be so cool if I had learned such an ability from childhood to use it in my youngsters. I profoundly believe that I will more satisfy than I am now.

To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that spending money on children is not only favorable for the society but also is beneficial for children as residents of society.

30 min

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 25, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ren as residents of society. 30 min
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, similarly, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2463.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04713114754 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84197006892 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524590163934 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 767.7 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3943073267 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.285714286 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2380952381 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.19047619048 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221245763229 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582309251908 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747174466761 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149570826624 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407396075685 0.0645574589148 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.