When you are assigned an important presentation for work or school, do you prefer to work on it right away so that you can work on it a little bit every day, or wait until you have a good idea about the presentation?
Intrinsically, due to consciousness, human beings are responsible species. Imagine a situation when you meet a responsibility, what you should do with? What If it is an important job? Do you work on it a little bit every day or wait until you have a good idea about it? I will do it as soon as I achieve a good Idea. In what follows, I will delve into my perspective about it. Although waiting until find a good Idea maybe cause intense work in a short time, it will increase the concentration on the subject and improve the results somehow. Moreover, trying to find an Idea which is unique, new or fulfill your wants is a full-time job for the mind so it will power your brain as a result. Imagine you are in a university library and you have a presentation recently, Although you try to find a subject with searching books and journals simultaneously, your mind will work to find the best idea even unconsciously. You are empowering your brain in this way. Secondly, by determination of specific deadline our brain will work more coherently. Based upon research fulfilled lately the biochemical process of mind, concerns, and anxieties which happen because of external events are known by the neuropsychological system and help the brain to estimate the force major job and work vehemently cohesive. The last but not the least, good ideas some times are evaluated better by teachers. It means professors overweight unique or practical ideas more. If you are a teacher do you pay attention to an antiquated idea or a new one? Of course, everybody tries to find new sides of science even with an Idea. As you know most of the revolutionary scientific discoveries were an idea first. Perhaps a new Idea has been the next discovery. To sum up, empowering the brain will create by intense working with mind. Furthermore, specific deadlines will send a message to the brain and cause to work cohesively. Although most of the people are agreeing with working on a project little by little, lots of pioneers are people who work on good ideas which they obtain by intense mental work. It seems to be the next idea developer is not so far!
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...s an important job? Do you work on it a little bit every day or wait until you have a good...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1603, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...new sides of science even with an Idea. As you know most of the revolutionary scie...
^^
Line 1, column 1881, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'working'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: working
...l send a message to the brain and cause to work cohesively. Although most of the people...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1929, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...cohesively. Although most of the people are agreeing with working on a project little by lit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, of course, you know, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70133333333 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88391832216 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522666666667 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.6057002277 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1363636364 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0454545455 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95454545455 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438980727935 0.236089414692 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129765318802 0.076458572812 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14501118809 0.0737576698707 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.438980727935 0.150856017488 291% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.