We live in the society where machines and automation technologies are developing at a very high rate. However, in my opinion, I disagree with the claim made about people losing their jobs due to increase in automation. I feel this way for three reasons. I will explain them in subsequent passages.
To begin with, what are machines? A device or things made by humans and the smartest minds of the world. So, they were made to make human lives easier rather than to replace them. Machines are used to complement the tasks and not supersede by labours. For instance, in a car assembly line, the parts are made by machines. However, the design is carried out by an human, the accuracy and how the parts should be made is done by humans. So here the human plays a important role in any industry. Also in IT sector, it is based mainly on computers and automations, but to run it efficiently, equal human minds are needed which indirectly is related to employment of the humans.
Furthermore, any work we do, any firm we run, intuition and human decisions plays a important role to succeed. Intuitions and quick decisions can be made by humans and not machines. Sure, machine will help humans for doing so. However, the major role here is of humans. For example, I was working in the firm where all the data was stored in the machine and many of the decision were taken with the help of AI tools. The other day, when a client was upset with the outcome of the result. Me and manager had to intervene and solve the problem.
I believe in some firms there is more of a human mind needed over machines. As humans have unique way to think about every problem whereas machines are used to solve a problem in same way as it is functioned.
Finally, there are number of companies in this world. Start-ups, small scale, large scale and MNC's. So not everyone can afford the heavy automations for their assembly line, daily productivity, and all the tasks. Here the humans and labours come in the picture. In these types of company, humans are needed over machines. To illustrate this point, my friend used to work in a small-scale company, He told me about how his company works due to inadequate capital, it was whole and sole based on humans. All the tasks were carried by people but machines.
So, to sum up my point, I think these are some reasons which will make sure that people will not lose job even if there is increase in automation. In the end, this world works on uniqueness, intuitions, quick decision based on the situation. So, in all these tasks, people can't be replaced with machines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
.... However, the design is carried out by an human, the accuracy and how the parts s...
^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...done by humans. So here the human plays a important role in any industry. Also in...
^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...un, intuition and human decisions plays a important role to succeed. Intuitions a...
^
Line 10, column 274, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...tuation. So, in all these tasks, people cant be replaced with machines.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, whereas, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59569892473 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48217695807 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486021505376 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4294970772 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.2333333333 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.88709677419 327% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12149707081 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299062550488 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617234842745 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828845019395 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092043862169 0.0645574589148 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 11.7677419355 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.