It has recently been announced that a large shopping center may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.

Essay topics:

It has recently been announced that a large shopping center may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.

Considering my opinion about the establishment of a large shopping center in my neighborhood, I strongly incline to take the side the opposite direction of this event. Although the presence of a large shopping center can be ascribed as a main advantage to buy any commodity for my home, there are lot of problems that can lead to some enormous difficulties. To elaborate more on the topic mentioned, however, the following reasons and examples will be presented.

First and foremost, the establishment of a large shopping center will absolutely in conjunction with traffic problems. It goes without saying that a large amount of people from different area of city will come to my neighborhood for shopping. It is obvious that the preference to use own cars instead of public cars, increases remarkably, nowadays. If the parking of the shopping center cannot provide enough space for automobile of its customers, the accumulation of parked vehicles in the neighborhood will anticipate. In addition, even the parking of the large shopping center provides sufficient space, the pathway of my neighborhood will be captured by the cars of customers who want to enter the complex. Thus, if I have to do a partial job, I face with serious problems associated with traffic jam.

Another primary reason of my disagreement about building a large shopping center can be attributed to the noise pollution. Needless to say, all large shopping centers can be described as the business location for entrance of the trucks which transfer a large amount of commodities for sale. The presence of huge vehicles can bring about unbearable noise. Besides, regarding the advertisement of some products in the shopping center which use large amplifiers to transmit the voice, the produced loud voices can be indicated as another issue.

Aside from the point I made about, the possibility to decrease the cost of my home by the establishment of a large shopping center increases noticeably. Being one of the most proliferated known municipality problem, the presence of crowded complexes is recognized as a main factor for reduction of the home value. To my best knowledge, neither traffic problem nor noise pollution can be nominated as prominent matter as the economic value of my home. In other words, not only a decrease in the cost of my home is implied as a problem, but also considering the development program of the shopping center, the probability of home loss will guess.

To recapitulate, I cannot disagree more about the establishment of a large shopping center in my neighborhood regarding the traffic problems, the noise pollution, and the reduction of my home value. To my best knowledge, it is more advisable to construct the shopping centers in far area from large cities.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, thus, in addition, in fact, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2324.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10769230769 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01447299839 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474725274725 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 741.6 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6962745242 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.315789474 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9473684211 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179961989584 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698874925353 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038111876159 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120212428831 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321526280648 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.