It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours

Essay topics:

It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.

People these days have several job situations around them in this complex world, as they have relatively few choices and flexibility towards work schedule. Growing competition in these days have compelled commuters work dilligently and industriously. In around such situations, I would like to accede with the former job situation, i.e. choosing to work for three days a week for longer hours with couple of substantiations and reasons which are mentioned below.
For the first reason, working longer hours for three days a week though makes exhausted, if we can get complete free three or four days time in the particular week. Doesn't it allow us to render beautiful and loving moment which we can share with our family? For example, as in my cases if I need to go to meet my relatives who are pretty much far away from my residents, I do not need to rush or return immediately hurrying up to meet the job next day. Being retrospective, when I was 28, I made enough chance to stay overnight with my grandparents who used to stay 145 miles away my room. I received the pious opportunity of staying overnight with my magnanimous grandparents, though the generous office manager lent me an amnesty of three days leave per week on contract conditions.

For the second reason, working three days for longer hours a week are not boring as compared to working for few hours for more days. People these days are a trrible victim of depressions and anxious; they rarely get chance to make any pasttime ith their beloved ones because of aloof working office. Such extracted free time are sufficient to hang and spend with our family. For instance, my younger brother and his beloved wife both had to hone their brain for 6 days a week to get paid when they were in Japan. We family members predicted they were feeling despondent just because they didn't have job leave enough to meet each other and have short vacation moments. It is an easiy cogitable matter that if somebody has two or three days leave from tedious works, he/she can have a brilliant medication to heal their mind from overloads.
In conclusion, we can get few free days what we can call a short vacation for family meetings as well as we can have relaxing free days to provide self healing of mind, I always go with the logic of having three days work load of longer working hours.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Doesn't
... four days time in the particular week. Doesnt it allow us to render beautiful and lov...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 175, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'allows'?
Suggestion: allows
... time in the particular week. Doesnt it allow us to render beautiful and loving momen...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o not need to rush or return immediately hurrying up to meet the job next day. Be...
^^
Line 4, column 589, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...re feeling despondent just because they didnt have job leave enough to meet each othe...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71670702179 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54176632912 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535108958838 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7281824116 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.866666667 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5333333333 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386193384442 0.236089414692 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142144289938 0.076458572812 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118948465709 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268304906244 0.150856017488 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722488850886 0.0645574589148 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 58.1214874552 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.