Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer.
Our work place is a very important part of our lives. It is where we develop our ideas and increase our knowledge. Some people would believe that working with a group of people on a team is a great idea; others would think that working independently is better. In my view, I would prefer to work alone for two important reasons.
The main reason is that we can make our own schedule. Arrange a common time for a group of people could be very challenging. Also, people could be from different places and they will need to loose an entire day just really working for a couple of hours. For example, I remember an event that happened to me last year when I was doing my internship in Paris. I worked for an engineering company that have three different offices around the city. One time, my boss designated my to create a meeting with some engineers from the other places. I remember that was a very difficult to find an hour that everybody will be available. I tried to for an entire month without success and this was just the first one of many that we will need to make. After talking with my boss, we decided that dividing tasks would be more efficient and nowadays we just do in that way. As you can see, working independently showed to be a lot more easy for everybody.
Another reason is that we could be more focused during the job. Many people who love to work in group are always complaining about excessive conversation during meetings. Moreover, if we will be among friends this could be worst. It is very difficult to concentrate when someone start a subject when we are working in a group. For instance, I remember when I was in college and I had a very hard exam about aerodynamics to study. So, me and my colleagues reserved a study office in our college’s library to study together. Is was awful, every time someone started a new discussion, talking about all kinds of subjects. I stayed about four hours trying to study and, in the end, I realised that I barely touched my book. The result was that everybody received a tremendous bad mark on that test. This experience taught me that to always work alone when I have a very important thing to do.
In sum, though some may prefer working in group, definitively working independently is better. Not only you can create our own work time but also you will have more focus in your tasks. Everyone should try to work alone to see all the benefits that it have.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 191, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... different places and they will need to loose an entire day just really working for a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'starts'.
Suggestion: starts
...y difficult to concentrate when someone start a subject when we are working in a grou...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: VBZ_VBD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: It
...llege's library to study together. Is was awful, every time someone started a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, really, so, for example, for instance, talking about, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1986.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47297297297 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52209616732 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.4999314128 48.9658058833 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.5555555556 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.74074074074 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283689328789 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082790554581 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776186638486 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200010974705 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473639035167 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 11.7677419355 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.35 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.