It is more important for the governments to spend money to improve internet access than to improve public transportation.
It goes without saying that there has been always a controversial debate about in political meetings and also, between the ordinary people which infrastructure plays a more effective role in the livelihood of people and government must invest more in it. While many parochial people may not concede, I strongly subscribe to the view that dedicating budget by the government to promote internet access is more imperative than public transportation. The subsequent paragraphs will be illustrated to substantiate the perspective I asserted.
First and foremost, now that technology has come a long way and facilitated the access to a great deal of precious information which is thoroughly considered the most considerable requirements of everyone, enhancing internet access is more momentous than public transportation. In fact, utilizing the internet as a practical tool during the research and scrutinizing the acquired, up-to-date data on the internet, the scholars and engineers are completely bound up with the internet and they cannot cope with the duties which they are supposed to perform expeditiously. Thus, unless they have access to the internet with the best quality, they cannot engender such a substantial breakthrough in the heterogeneous spheres of science and as a result, the development process of the country will not be plausible. In addition, thanks to the most novel and efficient of teaching methods which internet has donated the schools and universities, they can now utilize the most superior online instructions and everyday amend their education systems and curriculum to accommodate the most innovative prerequisites of the modern life. Hence, elevating the accessibility of the internet, the governments now can explicitly engender such significant boons of education. Furthermore, the internet has boosted the consciousness of people about the noteworthy issues of livelihood like psychology, knowledge, humanity and ethical values in an unprecedented way.
Second, when it comes to the political and economic development of a country, the internet is the foremost option beyond it if the government is really enthusiastic to make a name for itself between the developed countries and acquire dignity between its nation. Actually, in the status quo, the prosperous governments are pioneer in the internet accessibility due to the fact that using the internet, they can easily expand their political relationships with the foreign countries with the assist of demonstrating their eminent achievements in the diverse domains. In other words, not only are they able to convince the powerful countries to maintain and extend their relations with them, but they also can attract international entrepreneurs to take the potentials of their country into consideration, and invest in their country which will conspicuously result in making a lot of jobs and will help them use this fund to promote the influential foundations of their country. Moreover, the more accessible the internet, the more the governments can save a great deal of money and invest on other requirements, which can be easily traced back to the point that nowadays, the role of the internet in a great number of official affairs like electronic banking, paying the bills or wage of employees are being done just by the internet. As an appropriate case in point, suppose that the U.S. had been intended to hold its presidential election without internet. If so, the election trend would have taken a long time with respect to its huge population.
In conclusion, taking all of the aforementioned grounds and explanations into account, I absolutely believe that government had better invest on enhancing the internet access since neither its scientific and educational boom nor its political and economic development is credible without the aid of the internet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 539, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ubstantiate the perspective I asserted. First and foremost, now that technology ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1004, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...e most superior online instructions and everyday amend their education systems and curri...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1424, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unprecedented way" with adverb for "unprecedented"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... knowledge, humanity and ethical values in an unprecedented way. Second, when it comes to the politic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1219, Rule ID: A_GREAT_NUMBER_OF_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'officials'?
Suggestion: officials
...le of the internet in a great number of official affairs like electronic banking, paying...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1487, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had taken'?
Suggestion: had taken
...out internet. If so, the election trend would have taken a long time with respect to its huge po...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 23, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...uge population. In conclusion, taking all of the aforementioned grounds and explanations...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, really, second, so, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in other words, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 52.1666666667 165% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3264.0 1977.66487455 165% => OK
No of words: 599.0 407.700716846 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44908180301 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94716853372 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16985344784 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 305.0 212.727598566 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50918196995 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 1023.3 618.680645161 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.1344086022 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.5268331013 48.9658058833 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 204.0 100.406767564 203% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 37.4375 20.6045352989 182% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3125 5.45110844103 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226698833036 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814509937746 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725484818291 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146614170107 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359148226904 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.0 11.7677419355 195% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.46 58.1214874552 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.10430107527 239% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 10.1575268817 186% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 168.0 86.8835125448 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.0537634409 167% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.